Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lord Sessadore" data-source="post: 4719850" data-attributes="member: 57255">Well, I think the Avenger will be just fine. His [W] multiples may be one or two lower than a rogue or ranger, but you have to remember that the rogue will probably have a [W] die at least two sizes smaller than the avenger, and the avenger will be ridiculously more accurate than either of them. Also, at higher levels the avenger's bonus damage can be pretty awesome when it comes into play. If you have a +6 Dex in paragon, you get +10 damage to every attack against your oath target if he runs away. It's constant, and it isn't 1/round. That, combined with much better than normal accuracy, and you can do some pretty sick average damage.FWIW, a lot of people on the internet think the paladin is a worthless class as well. I beg to differ - I think Raiyek does a pretty decent job. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> Also, most of the people who think so choose to take a viewpoint that minimizes the paladin's advantages, instead of maximizing them. That, and a lot of people think that fighters are simply unbeatable in the defender department <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

Verification