Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="JoeNotCharles" data-source="post: 4799980" data-attributes="member: 79945">The problem with this is that not all of the character judges have DDI accounts.  I have one, but I'm usually not on a Windows computer so I can't run the character builder most of the time.Personally, I'd have no problem with including a Character Builder attachment instead of the Math section, you should just be aware that it might slow down your acceptance because it means a lot of reviewers would need to skip over your character.  (On the other hand, those reviewers who DO have DDI could review your character much faster, so maybe it would balance out.)Yes, the wiki organization should be much improved.  The biggest roadblock is that enworld is very overloaded so editing the wiki can be really slow and painful, so I think everybody's who's sat down to reorganize has given up.BTW, the Transitive Isles page is linked to in the <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/living-4th-edition/246934-l4w-charter-read-first.html" target="_blank">charter thread</a>, under "World Building".  Maybe it should be made more prominent, though - it comes after a lot of technical fine print about Dungeon Mastering and experience calculations.  I think the Charter should start with an intro to the setting, and then character creation info, instead of rules first.I would say all these changes sound fine.Are any of the judges following the changes of all L4W: pages?  It would be great to get an RSS feed of all changes in L4W: except for characters, so that somebody could scan them and check for vandalism or just people going too far.I wouldn't want or expect a lot of hard-and-fast rules about editing the wiki.  But any sort of unwritten rules or customs?  Someone or someplace to "sanity check" any edits?  Do the judges generally review edits to the main pages?  (At the least, I'd planned to wait until after character approval.)</blockquote>[/QUOTE]

Verification