Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Let's Talk Blue Rose
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MoogleEmpMog" data-source="post: 2039529" data-attributes="member: 22882"><p>Well, in 3.x's defense, I'm very interested in the Blue Rose system but not necessarily to the exclusion of 3.x. Although I might revise my opinion when I actually get a good long look at the system, I'm not prepared to declare it flatly better than D&D 3.5, still less than d20 Modern.</p><p></p><p>Also, 3.x has a proven track record of being popular, whereas Blue Rose doesn't (at least, not yet). Popularity on ENWorld does not always translate into universal appeal.</p><p></p><p>For that matter, a somewhat less elegant and significantly more detailed system, Conan the Roleplaying Game, is, to the best of my knowledge, the most successful and widespread d20 variant on the market.</p><p></p><p>While I find both Conan and what I've seen of Blue Rose better in some respects than 3.x D&D, I wouldn't scrap the latter for either of the former.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And the 3e team did make the game more natural and obvious than 2e. They may have reached a level of nature and obviousness that appeals to the largest contingent of gamers. Then again, they may have erred in one direction or the other, or have made other compromises in the sake of nature and obviousness. Blue Rose may do the same.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm certainly 100% in favor of all three of these changes. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> </p><p></p><p>Although, I do prefer the gobs and gobs of base and prestige classes system to the 1-6 very flexible base classes system.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think this is part of it, but not in the way you mean.</p><p></p><p>d20 introduced a level of consistency (and a focus on balance) that D&D never had before, and other RPGs had to a lesser extent. I'm not even sure if SilCore was as elegant then as a stripped-down d20 is now, as I only have its rulebooks since the post-d20 revision.</p><p></p><p>Without the incredible amount of work that went into developing and hammering out the original d20 system, the more refined Blue Rose system probably would have been whole levels of development away.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MoogleEmpMog, post: 2039529, member: 22882"] Well, in 3.x's defense, I'm very interested in the Blue Rose system but not necessarily to the exclusion of 3.x. Although I might revise my opinion when I actually get a good long look at the system, I'm not prepared to declare it flatly better than D&D 3.5, still less than d20 Modern. Also, 3.x has a proven track record of being popular, whereas Blue Rose doesn't (at least, not yet). Popularity on ENWorld does not always translate into universal appeal. For that matter, a somewhat less elegant and significantly more detailed system, Conan the Roleplaying Game, is, to the best of my knowledge, the most successful and widespread d20 variant on the market. While I find both Conan and what I've seen of Blue Rose better in some respects than 3.x D&D, I wouldn't scrap the latter for either of the former. And the 3e team did make the game more natural and obvious than 2e. They may have reached a level of nature and obviousness that appeals to the largest contingent of gamers. Then again, they may have erred in one direction or the other, or have made other compromises in the sake of nature and obviousness. Blue Rose may do the same. I'm certainly 100% in favor of all three of these changes. :D Although, I do prefer the gobs and gobs of base and prestige classes system to the 1-6 very flexible base classes system. I think this is part of it, but not in the way you mean. d20 introduced a level of consistency (and a focus on balance) that D&D never had before, and other RPGs had to a lesser extent. I'm not even sure if SilCore was as elegant then as a stripped-down d20 is now, as I only have its rulebooks since the post-d20 revision. Without the incredible amount of work that went into developing and hammering out the original d20 system, the more refined Blue Rose system probably would have been whole levels of development away. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Let's Talk Blue Rose
Top