JeffB
Legend
Just wanted to bump to say I got a good looksee at the 4E FRCG (and PG) finally.
I can see how the FR scholars may not like it- It certainly is not as packed with info as the core 3E book was. When that book was released I gave it a pretty glowing review here- I still think it's a fantastic example of a "all you'll need" campaign setting book.
But the 4E FRCG is certainly MUCH easier on my aging eyes, and as a starting point for a new FR campaign it's considerably more detailed/useful than the 1E grey Box, or 2E revised Grey box (The DMs and Shadowdale booklets were not terribly useful, IME). It is also better organized than those two boxed sets (Though I agree the Loudwater chapter would be better off at, or at least near , the back of the book).
The map- I didn't think it was bad as it was made it out to be, I think the 2E boxed set maps are still the best , but the 4E map would suit my needs (as did the 1E and 3E maps)
Thanks everyone for the comments
I can see how the FR scholars may not like it- It certainly is not as packed with info as the core 3E book was. When that book was released I gave it a pretty glowing review here- I still think it's a fantastic example of a "all you'll need" campaign setting book.
But the 4E FRCG is certainly MUCH easier on my aging eyes, and as a starting point for a new FR campaign it's considerably more detailed/useful than the 1E grey Box, or 2E revised Grey box (The DMs and Shadowdale booklets were not terribly useful, IME). It is also better organized than those two boxed sets (Though I agree the Loudwater chapter would be better off at, or at least near , the back of the book).
The map- I didn't think it was bad as it was made it out to be, I think the 2E boxed set maps are still the best , but the 4E map would suit my needs (as did the 1E and 3E maps)
Thanks everyone for the comments
