Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Stalker0" data-source="post: 8190240" data-attributes="member: 5889">I greatly like this concept as this truly is a &quot;gap&quot; in 5e. My players joke when they find treasure &quot;oh look piles of worthless gold!&quot;.I think the key is to find that happy middle ground between the magic shop mentality that is 3.5 power scaling and the &quot;treasure is worthless&quot; mindset that 5e has. This idea feels like it threads the needle. The trick will be in the scaling. My initial fear is that the scaling will be too costly compared to buying another building, so instead of going &quot;I want a palace!&quot; The optimizer will instead go &quot;ok for the same price I can get 20 townhomes and get WAY more value&quot;.So that's my concern as you all try to finalize power and cost.Just noting, the +1 wisdom does not say (to a maximum of 20). Is that an oversight or is intended to break the 20 barrier?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Stalker0, post: 8190240, member: 5889"] I greatly like this concept as this truly is a "gap" in 5e. My players joke when they find treasure "oh look piles of worthless gold!". I think the key is to find that happy middle ground between the magic shop mentality that is 3.5 power scaling and the "treasure is worthless" mindset that 5e has. This idea feels like it threads the needle. The trick will be in the scaling. My initial fear is that the scaling will be too costly compared to buying another building, so instead of going "I want a palace!" The optimizer will instead go "ok for the same price I can get 20 townhomes and get WAY more value". So that's my concern as you all try to finalize power and cost. Just noting, the +1 wisdom does not say (to a maximum of 20). Is that an oversight or is intended to break the 20 barrier? [/QUOTE]

Verification