Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="kerleth" data-source="post: 6045244" data-attributes="member: 84383">Sleep seems a little fiddly to me as well. I'm pretty sure the 6 second round is actually mentioned in the &quot;How To Play&quot;, but I wouldn't swear to it. &nbsp;If I am understanding the common theme between your threads ren, it seems to be that next is broken. You are trying to perfectly align everyone so that they will be balanced in all situations. That is a noble goal, but one that can only lead to either monotany or frustration. There are going to be variables that cannot be controlled. There are going to be situations where one character shines over another. That is a part of the game, and is unavoidable. I myself would say it is a good thing.&nbsp;Now I may be completely misunderstanding, and if so I sincerely apologize. Also, please don't consider this any sort of personal attack. I just noticed that most of your posts on next seem to be of that sort. Your viewpoint seems to differ from mine on many things, and that makes me curious to understand it more. I'm wierd like that. I also do think it is a valuable exercise when trying to determine 1)fiddliness, and 2)relative powerto line up min, max, and average potential targets affected and complications created by spells like you are doing. If I am correct in assuming you have an issue with these spells, may I ask what your suggestions are?*Note: I may not be on for a couple of days, so please do not be insulted if I do not respond immediately. Hmmm, assuming that you would read this, respond directly to me, and then care if I responded or not is rather arrogant on my part isn't it? <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/blush.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":blush:" title="Blush&nbsp; &nbsp; :blush:" data-shortname=":blush:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="kerleth, post: 6045244, member: 84383"] Sleep seems a little fiddly to me as well. I'm pretty sure the 6 second round is actually mentioned in the "How To Play", but I wouldn't swear to it. If I am understanding the common theme between your threads ren, it seems to be that next is broken. You are trying to perfectly align everyone so that they will be balanced in all situations. That is a noble goal, but one that can only lead to either monotany or frustration. There are going to be variables that cannot be controlled. There are going to be situations where one character shines over another. That is a part of the game, and is unavoidable. I myself would say it is a good thing. Now I may be completely misunderstanding, and if so I sincerely apologize. Also, please don't consider this any sort of personal attack. I just noticed that most of your posts on next seem to be of that sort. Your viewpoint seems to differ from mine on many things, and that makes me curious to understand it more. I'm wierd like that. I also do think it is a valuable exercise when trying to determine 1)fiddliness, and 2)relative power to line up min, max, and average potential targets affected and complications created by spells like you are doing. If I am correct in assuming you have an issue with these spells, may I ask what your suggestions are? *Note: I may not be on for a couple of days, so please do not be insulted if I do not respond immediately. Hmmm, assuming that you would read this, respond directly to me, and then care if I responded or not is rather arrogant on my part isn't it? :blush: [/QUOTE]

Verification