Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Wye" data-source="post: 3493230" data-attributes="member: 50885">And here is the crux of the issue:We've heard the &quot;eyeballs&quot; comment before, but this time a number is attached to it. If only 1% of visitors actually pay for the subscription that's 130,000 subscriptions! A quick search at Paizo's website and I have the total paid circulation of Dragon magazine at 62,000 in 2005.So, it doesn't really matter how many people doesn't like it, only 0.5% has to buy in for them to make more money than the print magazines (assuming they charge the same). Heck, even if every single current Dragon subscriber/buyer doesn't spend a penny on the DI it wouldn't make a dent on their calculations.I like our capitalist system, it just sucks that this time I got the short end of the stick. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f621.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":mad:" title="Mad&nbsp; &nbsp; :mad:"&nbsp; data-smilie="4"data-shortname=":mad:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Wye, post: 3493230, member: 50885"] And here is the crux of the issue: We've heard the "eyeballs" comment before, but this time a number is attached to it. If only 1% of visitors actually pay for the subscription that's 130,000 subscriptions! A quick search at Paizo's website and I have the total paid circulation of Dragon magazine at 62,000 in 2005. So, it doesn't really matter how many people doesn't like it, only 0.5% has to buy in for them to make more money than the print magazines (assuming they charge the same). Heck, even if every single current Dragon subscriber/buyer doesn't spend a penny on the DI it wouldn't make a dent on their calculations. I like our capitalist system, it just sucks that this time I got the short end of the stick. :mad: [/QUOTE]

Verification