Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Looking to break out from eurogames
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Korgoth" data-source="post: 4618394" data-attributes="member: 49613"><p>If you want a proper wargame, get Conflict of Heroes: Awakening the Bear. I've just gotten into it and it's fantastic. It involves moving chits on a hex map, but they're one inch square linen-textured chits and the maps are gorgeous. Each time you play it you will play a "Firefight", which is their term for mission. There are two player missions, and also four player missions. More are available for download on their web site. Most are aimed at two players, though, so a regular four player group will be replaying the missions over again (I think there are four such missions available, but of course they're really big and there's a lot of variation).</p><p></p><p>One thing that is cool about it is that there are no charts to look up. You're rolling 2d6 plus the unit's firepower rating versus the other unit's defense rating (it has two, depending on if you are hitting it from the front or not). Firepower values labeled in red go best against red defense, but are halved against blue defense... and the same with blue firepower ratings (red being anti-personnel and blue being anti-tank). So rather than have a special rule for gun shields, shielded guns just have a front blue defense and a flank red defense. It's all pretty simple and elegant like that. If you hit the enemy unit, you draw a damage chit. It is killed if you hit by four or more, draw the killed chit, or if it is hit while already under a damage chit. Also, the way it does "overwatch" and the fluid nature of the battlefield is that for every action a unit executes (move one space, firing, trying to rally, etc.), the opponent may declare a reaction move right after that (so if you move, I can fire at you, then you can move again, etc.). You take turns activating units so there is a lot of back-and-forth. Good game, and fast. Oh, it's about Operation Barbarossa, by the way.</p><p></p><p>Another wargame that supports multiple players is Memoir '44. You have to buy two sets, though, or buy the special Overlord boxed expansion... but if you do that, you'll have to settle for using cardboard counters for some of the units rather than M44's premier feature, the little plastic dudes. There's even a special expansion aimed at playing "Overlord" style called "Hedgerow Hell", which is obviously about Normandy. It's a good game but there's a fair bit of luck involved, because you only get to move your battalions using cards. If you don't draw good cards, you're going to sit there getting owned and not be able to fight back very well. But it's fast and usually fun. Nota Bene: a famous boardgame reviewer seemed to think that playing the game in "Overlord" mode refers to the fact that each side has one top general which he called the "overlord". Obviously, it actually refers to Operation Overlord, which was the name for the invasion of Normandy by the Allies.</p><p></p><p>Risk 2210 suffers from being Risk, which is to say that it's obviously highly stylized. You move "armies" into whole countries/regions and I'm not sure what it all represents. However, in this particular version you get to conquer the Moon, and I'm can't think of why any reasonable person wouldn't want to do that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Korgoth, post: 4618394, member: 49613"] If you want a proper wargame, get Conflict of Heroes: Awakening the Bear. I've just gotten into it and it's fantastic. It involves moving chits on a hex map, but they're one inch square linen-textured chits and the maps are gorgeous. Each time you play it you will play a "Firefight", which is their term for mission. There are two player missions, and also four player missions. More are available for download on their web site. Most are aimed at two players, though, so a regular four player group will be replaying the missions over again (I think there are four such missions available, but of course they're really big and there's a lot of variation). One thing that is cool about it is that there are no charts to look up. You're rolling 2d6 plus the unit's firepower rating versus the other unit's defense rating (it has two, depending on if you are hitting it from the front or not). Firepower values labeled in red go best against red defense, but are halved against blue defense... and the same with blue firepower ratings (red being anti-personnel and blue being anti-tank). So rather than have a special rule for gun shields, shielded guns just have a front blue defense and a flank red defense. It's all pretty simple and elegant like that. If you hit the enemy unit, you draw a damage chit. It is killed if you hit by four or more, draw the killed chit, or if it is hit while already under a damage chit. Also, the way it does "overwatch" and the fluid nature of the battlefield is that for every action a unit executes (move one space, firing, trying to rally, etc.), the opponent may declare a reaction move right after that (so if you move, I can fire at you, then you can move again, etc.). You take turns activating units so there is a lot of back-and-forth. Good game, and fast. Oh, it's about Operation Barbarossa, by the way. Another wargame that supports multiple players is Memoir '44. You have to buy two sets, though, or buy the special Overlord boxed expansion... but if you do that, you'll have to settle for using cardboard counters for some of the units rather than M44's premier feature, the little plastic dudes. There's even a special expansion aimed at playing "Overlord" style called "Hedgerow Hell", which is obviously about Normandy. It's a good game but there's a fair bit of luck involved, because you only get to move your battalions using cards. If you don't draw good cards, you're going to sit there getting owned and not be able to fight back very well. But it's fast and usually fun. Nota Bene: a famous boardgame reviewer seemed to think that playing the game in "Overlord" mode refers to the fact that each side has one top general which he called the "overlord". Obviously, it actually refers to Operation Overlord, which was the name for the invasion of Normandy by the Allies. Risk 2210 suffers from being Risk, which is to say that it's obviously highly stylized. You move "armies" into whole countries/regions and I'm not sure what it all represents. However, in this particular version you get to conquer the Moon, and I'm can't think of why any reasonable person wouldn't want to do that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Looking to break out from eurogames
Top