Starfox
Hero
I don't owe anyone loyalty because they are a gamer. I am loyal to my friends, some of whom are gamers and some of whom are not. If you have a spot at my table, I owe you something....but not carte blanche! I will remove you if you don't belong. And I will accept your withdrawal if you don't feel my table is a good fit. That doesn't mean that I won't be your friend.
But Joe Gamer down the road? I don't owe him anything. Nor does he owe anything to me.
This might seem self-evident, but I maintain that it is not how people usually react. The world is full of cases where a group is loyal even to its fringe members. Such thing as gay communities, racial communities, golf communities... there are many cases. Maybe the gaming community is just too casual to inspire this kind of loyalty, or maybe it just has not been tested.
In Sweden we have a national association for gamers known as SVEROK. Organizations like that play a rather important role in how Sweden is governed, and SVEROK claims to speak for all gamers - with some success. If the "no ropleplay in prison" episode had happened here, I am pretty sure SVEROK would have spoken out on it. My picture of the US are that you people are just as involved in this kinds of issues as we are here, but maybe that depends on the issue in question.
Let me clarify that I'm just using the RP in Prison issue as an example. In this discussion I don't care about details or the rightness of that case, I am just using it to show an issue where the "gaming community spirit" failed to manifest. It could have been something else.
Last edited: