Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Verequus" data-source="post: 1815300" data-attributes="member: 9135">One thing, I've discovered, is, that there should be cantrips for every spell list - actually, one spell description for every 0 and 1 MP spell. Why? If you have beginners with EoMR and you start at level 1, then it is already time-intensive to explain the system - then having additionally to (re)make cantrips and look, if they can even function (E.G.: Is there a dragon with only a CR of 1/2 or 1?), is in such a situation too much. Because it is so much work and I didn't find time for that task, I'll postponed that idea. BTW, I've dubbed those spells &quot;Apprentice's friends&quot;.&nbsp;&nbsp;Looking on your wiki-page, Archus, I see, that you found the review from Arthur xxx (or the other review, which copied the relevant part). I wonder, if you plan to bring the entire rules online - I've considered this situation myself and I'm unsure, if this would hurt EN Publishing and subsequently Ryan too much. I've asked Ryan about this, but he hasn't replied yet.&nbsp;&nbsp;Related on this: Please don't use &quot;Elements of Magic&quot;, but &quot;Elements of Magic Revised&quot;, because they are different books. But because that title is IP and not under the OGL (which is missing on your wiki, too), you should consider the change of the title. I've came up with &quot;Elementary Magic&quot; and &quot;High Arcana&quot;, which are to be considered as being under the OGL - so feel free to use them.&nbsp;&nbsp;A last note: I don't know, if you will be happy with first edition of EoM - it is as much different from its successor as AD&amp;D from 3rd edition. Consider yourself warned.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Verequus, post: 1815300, member: 9135"] One thing, I've discovered, is, that there should be cantrips for every spell list - actually, one spell description for every 0 and 1 MP spell. Why? If you have beginners with EoMR and you start at level 1, then it is already time-intensive to explain the system - then having additionally to (re)make cantrips and look, if they can even function (E.G.: Is there a dragon with only a CR of 1/2 or 1?), is in such a situation too much. Because it is so much work and I didn't find time for that task, I'll postponed that idea. BTW, I've dubbed those spells "Apprentice's friends". Looking on your wiki-page, Archus, I see, that you found the review from Arthur xxx (or the other review, which copied the relevant part). I wonder, if you plan to bring the entire rules online - I've considered this situation myself and I'm unsure, if this would hurt EN Publishing and subsequently Ryan too much. I've asked Ryan about this, but he hasn't replied yet. Related on this: Please don't use "Elements of Magic", but "Elements of Magic Revised", because they are different books. But because that title is IP and not under the OGL (which is missing on your wiki, too), you should consider the change of the title. I've came up with "Elementary Magic" and "High Arcana", which are to be considered as being under the OGL - so feel free to use them. A last note: I don't know, if you will be happy with first edition of EoM - it is as much different from its successor as AD&D from 3rd edition. Consider yourself warned. [/QUOTE]

Verification