Mac Users Identify Yourselves!

Count me in... twice I guess... :)

Powerbook G3 Lombard (bronze)
Old Mac Powerbook (pre-G3)

I used to have an LC III as well, but that's gone now.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

ex Mac user here.

Gave up on them about 6 years ago, by my guess. I throught I'd always have one around the house, but the whole house is PC now.
 


Mac Linux user

You can count me, if I qualify. I run Debian GNU/Linux on my PowerMac B&W G3, my PowerMac Dual G4, and my iBook G3. My wife runs Debian GNU/Linux on her clamshell iBook G3, but she's not a gamer so I know she doesn't count. ;)

Hmm. I hope this works -- the preview feature doesn't seem to work in Mozilla anymore, though it did when last I posted (long time ago).

[EDIT: Fix misplaced slash.]
 
Last edited:

Redwald said:
You can count me, if I qualify. I run Debian GNU/Linux on my PowerMac B&W G3, my PowerMac Dual G4, and my iBook G3. My wife runs Debian/GNU Linux on her clamshell iBook G3, but she's not a gamer so I know she doesn't count. ;)
Click to expand...
Out of curiosity, what's the appeal of running Linux on an Apple box as opposed to an Intel/AMD box? And why that and not MacOS X (which is BSD at its core)?
 

buzz said:
Out of curiosity, what's the appeal of running Linux on an Apple box as opposed to an Intel/AMD box? And why that and not MacOS X (which is BSD at its core)?
Click to expand...

There are a few reasons, but I admit they may not be applicable to everyone. First, I'm a GNU/Linux software developer as a career and a hobby; I've preferred Unix-style environments to MS-DOS or Windows ever since I was first exposed to the Unix shell (about 12 years ago now).

Secondly, running a non-x86-compatible machine architecture renders you invulnerable to the vast majority of "shellcode"-type pieces of malware -- that is, those that take advantage of a buffer overflow to provoke a stack smash in an existing benign application and commandeer it with (usually hand-coded) malicious machine language. x86 machine instructions are nothing but unexecutable garbage on other platforms like the PowerPC, UltraSPARC, DEC/Compaq/HP Alpha, IA-64, PA-RISC, MIPS, ARM, and so forth.

Thirdly, I'm a free software activist, and prefer to run only software which I have the freedom to examine, modify and share with others. That is why I prefer a free Unix operating system to something like MacOS X, and why I've found the GNU/Linux community a more hospitable place than the BSD world. Still, I have a lot of respect for the free BSDs (FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD); they're pretty committed to free (if not copylefted) software licenses within their own projects, and OpenBSD's single-minded focus on improving computer security has yielded some greatly-improved software from which the broader Unix community has benefitted.

Finally, my wife runs Debian on her iBook because she got very tired of MacOS 9 crashing, and we didn't have a license to run MacOS X on it (besides, MacOS X is slow on my 600MHz iBook and would be torture on her 466MHz model). The MacOS-style "theme" of KDE 3.3 is a bit glitchy, but she's had no complaints about the stability, and that makes her pretty happy. She was rebooting MacOS all the time.

Hopefully my answer wasn't overkill. :D
 
Last edited:

Another Mac user here. 2x And recently converted my wife to an Apple laptop since tech support (me) is free. Now I am trying to get a projector hooked up for some gaming fun. I need to jury-rig some suspension thing.
 


Redwald said:
Secondly, running a non-x86-compatible machine architecture renders you invulnerable to the vast majority of "shellcode"-type pieces of malware -- that is, those that take advantage of a buffer overflow to provoke a stack smash in an existing benign application and commandeer it with (usually hand-coded) malicious machine language. x86 machine instructions are nothing but unexecutable garbage on other platforms like the PowerPC, UltraSPARC, DEC/Compaq/HP Alpha, IA-64, PA-RISC, MIPS, ARM, and so forth.
Click to expand...
Ah, I see. I wasn't aware of that; nifty! BUt how does this make you feel about the announced move to Intel CPUs?

Redwald said:
Still, I have a lot of respect for the free BSDs (FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD); they're pretty committed to free (if not copylefted) software licenses within their own projects, and OpenBSD's single-minded focus on improving computer security has yielded some greatly-improved software from which the broader Unix community has benefitted.
Click to expand...
FreeBSD was my first 'nix, and I run one of my company's sites on an OpenBSD box.

Redwald said:
Finally, my wife runs Debian on her iBook because she got very tired of MacOS 9 crashing, and we didn't have a license to run MacOS X on it (besides, MacOS X is slow on my 600MHz iBook and would be torture on her 466MHz model).
Click to expand...
I can understand that. I use a B&W G3 with a G4 CPU upgrade, and even that didn't make MacOS X as sprightly as I'd prefer. Running X on any Mac with unsupported (i.e., QuartzExtreme-incapable) video hardware is best avoided.

Redwald said:
Hopefully my answer wasn't overkill. :D
Click to expand...
Quite the contrary. Thanks!
 

buzz said:
Ah, I see. I wasn't aware of that; nifty! BUt how does this make you feel about the announced move to Intel CPUs?
Click to expand...

Well, I'm not thrilled with it. :\ Still, the importance of shellcode exploits should not be overestimated. Cross-site scripting exploits and JavaScript in general are also significant sources of security incidents, and these are almost always independent of machine architecture (sometimes they are OS-specific, though, which means everyone not running Wiindows is marginally safer).

With Apple abandoning the PowerPC and IBM having farmed off its consumer-grade x86 division to the Lenovo Group, I'm curious to see if Big Blue does something interesting with the POWER architecture (almost identical to PowerPC) that mere mortals can acquire.
 

Remove ads

Top