Mageslayer and invisible opponents

[Aaron]

In the initial reply to this thread, I've taken the point of view that the two are not synonymous - it's possible to have a square into which you can make a melee attack (the definition of threatening) even if you are unable to make an AoO into that square. But the other point of view exists.

So you have taken the point of view that states that you don't threaten with the IUS feat.

 

[Hypersmurf]

So you have taken the point of view that states that you don't threaten with the IUS feat.

For the purposes of the first reply to this thread, sure.

-Hyp.

 

[Aaron]

For the purposes of the first reply to this thread, sure.

-Hyp.

Why did you chose that point of view in this thread?

 

[Hypersmurf]

Why did you chose that point of view in this thread?

You see why I called it the trickier question.

-Hyp.

 

[Aaron]

You see why I called it the trickier question.

-Hyp.

Tricky indeed, but you didn't show the other point of view.

That's why I'm asking.

 

[Hypersmurf]

Tricky indeed, but you didn't show the other point of view.

It's been shown now - is there an issue?

-Hyp.

 

[Aaron]

It's been shown now - is there an issue?

-Hyp.

You didn't show the other point of view until I asked for it.

If I didn't know the other thread I would assume that your point of view was "you threaten even if you can't make AoOs": period.

Since many people here accept your point of view as the point of view on the rules, I'm wondering why you took that point of view.

 

[Hypersmurf]

Call it an off day.

-Hyp.