Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Magic items in D&D Next: Remove them as PC dependant?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sunseeker" data-source="post: 5842226"><p>I think there was some attempt to do this in the past, but I feel that almost everything interesting was almost always in the "wonderous" category. I think Wizards could take a hint from their MTG game design for what can qualify as "common" in relative magical power levels. Being common shouldn't mean it's basically worthless, it should just mean it's common. Can any blackmsith worth their salt make a Masterwork weapon? Yes. That means it's common.</p><p></p><p>Items with truly magical abilities(on use/on hit/ect..) should always be uncommon, but your generic +1 amulet of protection I think, might not be such. </p><p></p><p>Perhaps they should simply assign everything gold values and then provide a low/moderate/high magic breakdown of where approximate gold values would place an item. +1 amulet of protection might even be somewhat mundane in a high-magic setting, or incredibly valuable and rare.</p><p></p><p>As an aside: I'd like to see Wizards expand the list of "everyone can use this" utility items. Simple things that restore some HP, refresh an expended power, provide an extra swift action, ect... There's a whole butt-load of items that are very specific to a certain build or a certain type of character and all that really does is create a lot of bloat.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sunseeker, post: 5842226"] I think there was some attempt to do this in the past, but I feel that almost everything interesting was almost always in the "wonderous" category. I think Wizards could take a hint from their MTG game design for what can qualify as "common" in relative magical power levels. Being common shouldn't mean it's basically worthless, it should just mean it's common. Can any blackmsith worth their salt make a Masterwork weapon? Yes. That means it's common. Items with truly magical abilities(on use/on hit/ect..) should always be uncommon, but your generic +1 amulet of protection I think, might not be such. Perhaps they should simply assign everything gold values and then provide a low/moderate/high magic breakdown of where approximate gold values would place an item. +1 amulet of protection might even be somewhat mundane in a high-magic setting, or incredibly valuable and rare. As an aside: I'd like to see Wizards expand the list of "everyone can use this" utility items. Simple things that restore some HP, refresh an expended power, provide an extra swift action, ect... There's a whole butt-load of items that are very specific to a certain build or a certain type of character and all that really does is create a lot of bloat. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Magic items in D&D Next: Remove them as PC dependant?
Top