dragonhead
First Post
wmasters said:Actually, I disagree with this - the objective after all wasn't necessarily to produce unbalancing strong cards and certainely wasn't to produce cards to improve an existing deck archetype. Incidentally, who was judging the competition? Was it voted for by Magic players, or looked at by game designers? You'd get a very different response I imagine.
I wasnt saying they should be unbalancing strong, just need to be a touch stronger for such a high cost. the point is to make a card thats both balanced and a card the players would want to play. the cards listed are neither, which is why wickett is no longer in the contest.