I think taking this approach would make Daily powers with Miss effects less desirable. And those powers are balanced on the fact they HAVE a miss effect. So, would this require bumping up Dailies with miss effects, in your opinion?Keterys said:I'd considered a reliable-ish approach like:
'When using a daily power, after rolling all attacks you may choose to have instead _not used the power at all_. The action is still lost, but the power is not spent and nothing happens as a result of the power.'
Just the way I play. I don't want to charge a feat for something intended to ease player frustration over the system. I don't think it's good enough to deserve a feat.why so? just curious, seems like it would work well... unless it falls under the 'feat so good everyone would take it' clause.
That is a good point actually, although the player would have to balance "do I want to take the miss result now with the effect" Vs "do I think we have something else that will help us instead?"I think taking this approach would make Daily powers with Miss effects less desirable. And those powers are balanced on the fact they HAVE a miss effect. So, would this require bumping up Dailies with miss effects, in your opinion?
I certainly see your point - though I'm sure my group would see it as a feat. differences in style, nothing wrong there.Just the way I play. I don't want to charge a feat for something intended to ease player frustration over the system. I don't think it's good enough to deserve a feat.