male playing female PC

Hahaha oh man.. is this thread still going on? Uh, I think the original poster has long decided on what to do with his male player playing a female character. Yet still here you all are. Is it taboo to point out the blatantly obvious on messageboards? I really don't know, I'm still kinda new. Would it be bad form to mock all of you? What if I did but didn't type it out? Ah, but seriously...

I don't allow people to play evil characters in my games either. I'm guessing someone else has brought up this point also by now. My games aren't exploratory theatre or group therapy sessions. (Though I must say, the act of roleplaying and socializing with people in a group can certainly be theraputic, but that's something we take from it privately, eh?) I don't even recommend that people new to my games try out something wildly new to them (unless it's a new game to all of us, then, well, duh), because I want them to play their best, and to play well. If Gamer Johnny always plays an elf, and really doesn't like to play anything but elfs, and I have elfs in my game world, then sure, Johnny can play an elf. He likes to play elfs, he's done it before, he's prolly good at it, at the very least, he knows all their abilities and whatnot. But Johnny wants to play an evil female elf? No go. Johnny can work out that with another DM.

I offer up this Real Life case, as a cautionary tale about why I personally don't allow just anything to be played in my game. Once upon a time, I was running a Mage game. Yeah, I was a White Wolf geek for a while. I had a pretty good chronicle going, and had just wrapped up the first story arc, and was moving on to the second. Well, I looked around and decided to wrangle up some new players, to mix in with my current players, New story arc and all. So a few people responded to local ads in game shops. Well one guy contacts me, and we talk, and he seems cool, so I have him come over for the next game. On the phone he told me he wanted to play a Cult of Ecstacist, which for those of you who don't know, are basically mages that cast their magic through the use of vices. You know, hallucinogens, other drugs, alcohol, smoking, gambling, whatever makes them happy, so to speak. (Mage, I think, out of all the Storyteller games, is the most "adult".) So, before the guy ever came over, me and my roommate (also a player in the game) are kicking back and joking about some of the people who have gamed with us in the past, and I say "Watch this guy is a screaming freak and wants his focus to be masturbation." And we have a good laugh followed by some lewd speculation and laugh some more but eventually we move on to other topics, etc... Game day, and the guy shows up. I get out the rulebooks and have the fellow start making a character. Most all of the other players (including a female player) were already there, and we were all getting ready for the game, going through whatever pre-game rituals (claiming the best seat in the room, pre-rolling dice, reading up on rules, full contact sparring (two martial artist roommates)), when the new player pipes up:

"My focus is gonna be masturbation, is that cool?"

Silence fell over the room. You could hear a couple dice tumble over. A rulebook page flutter. A roundhouse kick pause in mid air.

"What?" I think I said. He repeated what he had said, then added something about how he had it figured out.

"You're joking, right?" I asked. No, he said, and then he stood up and proceeded to put his hand in his pocket, so as to explain as how the character could make it subtle when he wanted work magic.

"Get out of my house." I said. And despite a couple rather angry protests, he was out the door in less than a minute. We didn't game that day, instead, we sat around and alternately laughed about the whole thing and were weirded out by it. And this, my friends, is just one of too many instances where I have seen the nice friendly hobby of roleplaying go HORRIBLY WRONG.

Can you fault me then, for being wary of gamers who want to explore "alternate" ideas in my games? Would you allow such a thing to go on in one of your gaming groups? I defy you to not agree with me that my caution is warranted. Can you really now tell me that I should allow someone to play something I am uncomfortable with in a game that I am running? Eh, maybe you can, but you won't change my mind.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


mistergone said:

"My focus is gonna be masturbation, is that cool?"

...

"Get out of my house." I said. And despite a couple rather angry protests, he was out the door in less than a minute. We didn't game that day, instead, we sat around and alternately laughed about the whole thing and were weirded out by it. And this, my friends, is just one of too many instances where I have seen the nice friendly hobby of roleplaying go HORRIBLY WRONG.

Female characters == masturbation?

Aw crap, he's FIGURED OUT MY SCHTICK. Damn!

Can you fault me then, for being wary of gamers who want to explore "alternate" ideas in my games? Would you allow such a thing to go on in one of your gaming groups? I defy you to not agree with me that my caution is warranted. Can you really now tell me that I should allow someone to play something I am uncomfortable with in a game that I am running?

Well, if female characters make you think of masturbation, I'm certainly not going to tell you otherwise.

Eh, maybe you can, but you won't change my mind.

I'm not trying to change your mind.


Hong "your mission is to figure out what I AM doing" Ooi
 

mistergone said:
"My focus is gonna be masturbation, is that cool?"

Silence fell over the room. You could hear a couple dice tumble over. A rulebook page flutter. A roundhouse kick pause in mid air.

"What?" I think I said. He repeated what he had said, then added something about how he had it figured out.

"You're joking, right?" I asked. No, he said, and then he stood up and proceeded to put his hand in his pocket, so as to explain as how the character could make it subtle when he wanted work magic.

You complain about how off-topic and over-baked this is, and then you contribute a terrific conversation piece :) Good work!

I have to say, I can appreciate the idea (in the sense that I can appreciate Vito Acconci) of having a character like that in a game... Especially if the guy role-played it. I mean, you'd constantly be wondering: Is he really doing that?

Also, I'm assuming that "get out of my house" part was hyperbole -- a person doesn't lose the right to be treated with decency and courtesy just because they're really really really damn weird. :p
 

hong said:


Female characters == masturbation?

Aw crap, he's FIGURED OUT MY SCHTICK. Damn!



Well, if female characters make you think of masturbation, I'm certainly not going to tell you otherwise.



I'm not trying to change your mind.


Hong "your mission is to figure out what I AM doing" Ooi

Being a jackass?
;)
 

mistergone said:

Being a jackass?

I can but react, for to post without conscious thought is the pinnacle of achievement.


dead1.gif
 

Guilt Puppy said:


You complain about how off-topic and over-baked this is, and then you contribute a terrific conversation piece :) Good work!

Well, hey... I never said I was in any way above it. Reap the whirlwind!

Guilt Puppy said:

I have to say, I can appreciate the idea (in the sense that I can appreciate Vito Acconci) of having a character like that in a game... Especially if the guy role-played it. I mean, you'd constantly be wondering: Is he really doing that?

Also, I'm assuming that "get out of my house" part was hyperbole -- a person doesn't lose the right to be treated with decency and courtesy just because they're really really really damn weird. :p

Uh, okay, maybe in your ideal magical realm of frainbows and rivers of beer, sure, they get all the same decency and courtesy as everyone else. >Backs slowly away<
 

fusangite said:

What is even more problematic is the idea that atheism or agnosticism would be even remotely appropriate in any pre-modern society.

hmmm... Since the term atheism was coined in a defitily premodern age, I'm not sure this is a valid concern historically. You don't need to know the answers, simply feel that "I don't know" is a better one than "g/God(s) did it". However a 'pre modern' soceity with working divine magic would certainly put the kibosh on either worldveiw. Regular exposure to both clerics and wizards would certainly lead to one theological worldveiw, and it would be a situation where the old cannard was true - atheism or agnosticism would require far more mental gymnastics than religion.

On the other hand, failure to WORSHIP any of the known gods would be a completely valid mindset in such a world. (especially amoung adventurers who have seen gods and their followers at their worst). Such a veiw wouldn't be called atheism or agnosticism in the modern uses, but some cultural term (unalligned?) would be common. I would never fail to allow a character who wanted (as pratchett would say) to stand on a steeple in a thunderstorm yelling 'all gods are bastards!' from playing it to the hilt.

Kahuna Burger
 

fusangite said:
Kahuna Burger and Daniel raise a good point about atheists playing religious characters. This has, in my experience, been really problematic. I find that our modern views of religion's function are so different from pre-modern views that people have no idea how to play religious characters.

I agree with you that that's a problem; I remember having a long discussion with one of my players about how, in the campaign world, atheism was a form of insanity on par with not believing in mountains or pastries or something. When Gods are a part of the world in such a blatant fashion, not believing in them is bizarre. Furthermore, IMC, not worshipping the Gods was a sign of antisocialism: just as you obey the laws, say "excuse me" when you bump into someone, and don't talk smack about someone's mama, you don't dis the Gods. I told her I'd let her play a non-worshipping PC, but that she really needed to think about whether she wanted to, because people (including other PCs) would react to her with horrified disgust and contempt.

But that's a whole nother kettle of fish. It wouldn't bother me to play in a campaign where all characters had to be religious. What would bother me is if the DM looked at my personality and dictated to me whether my PC had to be religious.

Similarly, I could play fine in a single-sex campaign,w here we all had to create male PCs or female PCs, or a game in which we all had to be illiterate, or all had to be loyalists to an evil king. That's no problem.

What's a problem is when the DM assumes that I'm an incompetent roleplayer and restricts my choices for PCs to those that are similar to my real-life self. That's when I'll find a different DM.

Daniel
 

mistergone said:
... and then he stood up and proceeded to put his hand in his pocket, so as to explain as how the character could make it subtle when he wanted work magic.

By my ethics, public masturbation, clothed or not, is sufficient reason to be ejected from a game.
 

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top