Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Maybe this is a bit late, but let's talk about Rogue's Niche, and What Rogue Should Be.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="James Gasik" data-source="post: 9370867" data-attributes="member: 6877472"><p>Yeah basically, if you set DC's based on expecting non-Rogues to be able to succeed, the Rogue's benefits trivialize most ability checks. If you set DC's based on only expecting Rogues to be able to succeed, then Rogues become a must-have, which is contrary to 5e's design, which expects almost any party configuration to be able to equally contribute, so nobody ever feels forced to play a given class (how well 5e meets that design goal I won't comment on at the moment).</p><p></p><p>Starfinder ran into this very problem with their Operative class- having an Operative in the party mostly made anyone else using skills kind of irrelevant. You ask for a DC 15 check and this guy is like "uh...35. No, 36" (some hyperbole, but not much).</p><p></p><p>I mean, think about this. By Tier 3, a Rogue can potentially have a skill bonus of +13 and Reliable Talent says they can't possibly roll less than a 23. I once played a Rogue with Perception Expertise who owned a Robe of Eyes in AL, and the DM just kind of threw up his hands any time there was a hidden thing or enemies who were intended to ambush the party. An encounter with invisible Duergar assassins got turned inside out.</p><p></p><p>My friend was tellling me about a character in Critical Role who took Observant and had a passive Perception in the 30's (I don't know how accurate this is, but it's not impossible to do).</p><p></p><p>You can suddenly find entire sections of the game removed from most play if you don't scale the game to the Rogue's level. But rather than step back from that ledge, many other classes are purportedly being buffed to be able to occasionally reach these heights in 2024.</p><p></p><p>Expertise is simply put, the bane of the skill system. </p><p></p><p>The Rogue really shouldn't have "skill use" as their hat, if that means they are "so good at skills it's basically their system, and other classes are sometimes allowed to play too".</p><p></p><p>What I suggest is that the Rogue be allowed to do more with skills than other classes. Using Stealth to hide where others can't, being able to climb along ceilings, and so on. We see a little of this with the Thief, who can, for example make skill checks in record time, like opening a lock or disabling a trap with a <strong>bonus action</strong> (!), which runs right into the DM's declaration of how long it takes to perform said actions (forcing them to either allow the Rogue superhuman speed or nerf the Thief's ability).</p><p></p><p>Also, there should be more combat uses of skills, so that the Rogue has other interesting things to do than shoot a crossbow. They should be proficient in all manner of thrown weapons like acid, oil, holy water. Able to spread caltrops and spill marbles more efficiently. Handing out potions with bonus actions! Actually using and setting traps! Their stealth shouldn't be trivialized by some special sense, allowing them to actually skulk about (and definitely shouldn't be trivialized by <em>pass without trace</em>). Rogues should be able to hide in plain sight, throw flash powder, and not need a <strong>ring of invisibility</strong> to actually function effectively.</p><p></p><p>The Rogue will get some neat things to do with their Sneak Attack dice in 2024, but as long as the most effective status effect is dead, and thus making damage king, the Rogue is going to be in a rough position if they aren't main damage dealers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="James Gasik, post: 9370867, member: 6877472"] Yeah basically, if you set DC's based on expecting non-Rogues to be able to succeed, the Rogue's benefits trivialize most ability checks. If you set DC's based on only expecting Rogues to be able to succeed, then Rogues become a must-have, which is contrary to 5e's design, which expects almost any party configuration to be able to equally contribute, so nobody ever feels forced to play a given class (how well 5e meets that design goal I won't comment on at the moment). Starfinder ran into this very problem with their Operative class- having an Operative in the party mostly made anyone else using skills kind of irrelevant. You ask for a DC 15 check and this guy is like "uh...35. No, 36" (some hyperbole, but not much). I mean, think about this. By Tier 3, a Rogue can potentially have a skill bonus of +13 and Reliable Talent says they can't possibly roll less than a 23. I once played a Rogue with Perception Expertise who owned a Robe of Eyes in AL, and the DM just kind of threw up his hands any time there was a hidden thing or enemies who were intended to ambush the party. An encounter with invisible Duergar assassins got turned inside out. My friend was tellling me about a character in Critical Role who took Observant and had a passive Perception in the 30's (I don't know how accurate this is, but it's not impossible to do). You can suddenly find entire sections of the game removed from most play if you don't scale the game to the Rogue's level. But rather than step back from that ledge, many other classes are purportedly being buffed to be able to occasionally reach these heights in 2024. Expertise is simply put, the bane of the skill system. The Rogue really shouldn't have "skill use" as their hat, if that means they are "so good at skills it's basically their system, and other classes are sometimes allowed to play too". What I suggest is that the Rogue be allowed to do more with skills than other classes. Using Stealth to hide where others can't, being able to climb along ceilings, and so on. We see a little of this with the Thief, who can, for example make skill checks in record time, like opening a lock or disabling a trap with a [B]bonus action[/B] (!), which runs right into the DM's declaration of how long it takes to perform said actions (forcing them to either allow the Rogue superhuman speed or nerf the Thief's ability). Also, there should be more combat uses of skills, so that the Rogue has other interesting things to do than shoot a crossbow. They should be proficient in all manner of thrown weapons like acid, oil, holy water. Able to spread caltrops and spill marbles more efficiently. Handing out potions with bonus actions! Actually using and setting traps! Their stealth shouldn't be trivialized by some special sense, allowing them to actually skulk about (and definitely shouldn't be trivialized by [I]pass without trace[/I]). Rogues should be able to hide in plain sight, throw flash powder, and not need a [B]ring of invisibility[/B] to actually function effectively. The Rogue will get some neat things to do with their Sneak Attack dice in 2024, but as long as the most effective status effect is dead, and thus making damage king, the Rogue is going to be in a rough position if they aren't main damage dealers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Maybe this is a bit late, but let's talk about Rogue's Niche, and What Rogue Should Be.
Top