D&D General Melf's Guide to Greyhawk: The Shield Lands

[bedir than]

People don’t apologize when no harm has been done.

No harm was done in the book upon which you insist Dan is apologizing to Luke for. Luke certainly wasn't harmed. Dan and WotC didn't publish the book.

Quoting the words of someone isn't harming them.

 

[VashVet]

Sure and he could have apologized for Santa forgetting Luke’s Star Wars figures that Christmas and leaving him with a redeemable gift card instead.
My hypothesis has much more credibility than anything you listed above. You are just upset because it is likely true. People don’t apologize when no harm has been done.

One thing that we do know is true. You are interested in this course of discussion because it makes you feel personally vindicated. We know this because it’s what you said earlier here:

D&D General - Melf's Guide to Greyhawk: The Shield Lands

In other words, it’s less about the substance of the apology and more about wanting to crow about thinking you’re “right” because someone said you were “wrong” before.

 

[Whizbang Dustyboots]

Sure and he could have apologized for Santa forgetting Luke’s Star Wars figures that Christmas and leaving him with a redeemable gift card instead.
My hypothesis has much more credibility than anything you listed above. You are just upset because it is likely true. People don’t apologize when no harm has been done.

I'm not upset at all. But if they thought it was any of your business, they would have been more explicit.