Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 8791308" data-attributes="member: 6790260">I 100% believe they can, and that they should. Unless and until I am given good reason to think either of those things is untrue, I'm going to keep advocating for it. Wouldn't you, in my shoes?Most of which was (a) smear campaign (since we now know the game was doing just fine financially, it just wasn't selling absolute unbelievable gangbusters), and (b) actively creating their own worst enemy via the GSL inducing the creation of Pathfinder.And I think that both completely trivializes the actual concerns present here and conflates several issues that should not be mistaken as being one issue. Note, here, that you are the one dragging in 4e-related edition warring, and I have done my best to keep that out of my statements, speaking as generally as I can. People talk a lot about how this issue devolves into edition warring and re-litigating old subjects. If you want to actually debate the substance of my argument, please, go ahead. Otherwise, I just want it to be recognized where this topic got broached and why.</blockquote>