MerricB Has Reviewed a Bunch of 3rd-Party D&D 5E Products! And One Old One!

Despite the lack of a license, the third-party market for D&D 5E stuff is growing - an adventures seem particularly popular. MerricB (long time EN World member and blogger) has taken it upon himself to review these products as they come out. I've listed the reviews and his short comments, below, but click through for the full reviews plus a bonus scathing review of the old D&D adventure Quagmire! from back in 1984.

The Temple of Qultar by Chubby Monster Games -- Short site-based adventure with good flavour.

DG1: Secrets in the Dark by Dan Hass Endeavors -- Two foes ally with each other in a short, mostly linear adventure.

DG2 - The Lost Tome by Dan Hass Endeavors -- Simple adventure around the quest for a book.

DG3: The Archaeologist -- A noble needs help (but beware his previous "help"!)

DG4: And the Elf Prince Wept -- Promising beginning of a war-based adventure arc.

M1: An Echo of Days Past: A Storm About To Break by Arcadian Games-- Ambitious 99-page adventure set on the frontier lands of an expanding kingdom.

Merric also reviews old D&D adventures, and recently took on Quagmire! which he thinks is awful: "People talk about bad adventures like The Forest Oracle because they’re at least interesting in how they go wrong. No-one talks about Quagmire! because it’s just dull. The main hook for the adventure doesn’t work, and though there is some attempt at more detailed wilderness exploration, the results are hardly worth the effort. This is one of the worst adventures I’ve read in the line."

17100.jpg




 

log in or register to remove this ad


Bruce Heard, when he came to this area in the Princess Ark series, basically ignored most of the adventure and just said it took place sometime in the distant past. "I didn't think anyone would be particularly fascinated by thousands of miles of swamp, desert, and featureless plains with nobody around! I made these changes in order to liven the place up..."

Apparently some of the initial reaction to the adventure was favourable, but it didn't do anything for me!

Cheers!
 

All I can think on that Quagmire cover is the mage howling "Robes were a bad choice!" Ron Burgundy style. Seriously man, get some waders!

At first glance, I though a bard was playing her magical animated violin with her rapier, to charm a snake.

Which would be a great improvement on what the cover actually is IMNSHO.
 

Quagmire! cover truly calls for vengeance! :)

I am wondering more about how it's possible to publish 5e compatible material without a licensing system; for example, how are monsters treated? NPC stats? Do these modules just refer to the manuals?
 


There's a number of approaches, some might even be legal. :)

I'm sure of that. Sadly I'm not much learned in the field. Probably they're referring to the old OGL.

I am wondering about one scenario, though, and maybe someone can help me: if I publish an adventure that features an Illithid, and I just give the reference (i.e.: you encounter a Mind Flayer, with n HP) leaving the DM to look up the stats in the manuals, am I infringing WotC copyright, or some other law?
 

I'm sure of that. Sadly I'm not much learned in the field. Probably they're referring to the old OGL.

I am wondering about one scenario, though, and maybe someone can help me: if I publish an adventure that features an Illithid, and I just give the reference (i.e.: you encounter a Mind Flayer, with n HP) leaving the DM to look up the stats in the manuals, am I infringing WotC copyright, or some other law?

Copyright, no. Trademark, possibly. Depends on which names they trademarked...
 

Yeah, there's a small number of monsters WotC considers its own (as opposed to drawn from mythology etc). Mindflayers, beholders, and some others.
 


Remove ads

Remove ads

Top