Kafkonia
First Post
So, I'm building a non-monk unarmed fighter (not optimized, I know.) I was looking at picking up an Amulet of Mighty Fists +1 (6000 GP) -- but then I realized that a single +1 gauntlet will net the same effect for less than half the cost. So why would I pick the amulet instead? I feel like I'm overlooking something.
Thoughts I had:
1) The gauntlet can be taken away. But then, so can the amulet.
2) The amulet covers all unarmed strikes. But the system doesn't tend to differentiate between body parts, so it would only be an issue if he lost use of the arm the gauntlet belongs to. And even so, I could pick up one for each hand and still have spent less.
3) It's not party of the concept. Putting gauntlets on does sort of negate the "unarmed" aspect of the concept, but he's not a martial artist, he's a villager who's grown up having little reason to fight with weapons.
Also, he could always get the gauntlet enchanted beyond +1 bonuses -- flaming, bane, etc. -- if the opportunity were to arise.
So, please, convince me to take the amulet.
Thoughts I had:
1) The gauntlet can be taken away. But then, so can the amulet.
2) The amulet covers all unarmed strikes. But the system doesn't tend to differentiate between body parts, so it would only be an issue if he lost use of the arm the gauntlet belongs to. And even so, I could pick up one for each hand and still have spent less.
3) It's not party of the concept. Putting gauntlets on does sort of negate the "unarmed" aspect of the concept, but he's not a martial artist, he's a villager who's grown up having little reason to fight with weapons.
Also, he could always get the gauntlet enchanted beyond +1 bonuses -- flaming, bane, etc. -- if the opportunity were to arise.
So, please, convince me to take the amulet.
