Why did I treat it as if it was serious?
I have a dry sense of humor, I guess. In the actual interview, my question was a tongue-in-cheek "how does it feel to be the D&D antichrist to so many people?" When I wrote up the essay, I didn't think the humor came through, so I grasped around for something I thought was amusing but still made the point that there was this whole "Mike Mearls/4th edition = bad" meme out there. I mean, there are plenty of actual threads filled with genuine villification of the guy and the game so if I had wanted to use one of those, I could have. But this thread had made me laugh, so that's what I used. I figured people would click through and enjoy it, as compared to clicking through and getting, you know, actual hate.
I certainly didn't mean to cause you guys any rage. But sometimes no matter what you do, it's bad. Mike Mearls ruined my chances of pleasing everyone.