MM3 Typos

There are two "page xx" errors on page 7. Both of them are "See also 'Damage Type,' page xx."

It's nothing of dawizard proportions, I admit. I only mention it because I hardly ever see typos of this sort in D&D books.
 

log in or register to remove this ad



There are two "page xx" errors on page 7. Both of them are "See also 'Damage Type,' page xx."

It's nothing of dawizard proportions, I admit. I only mention it because I hardly ever see typos of this sort in D&D books.
It's hard to notice, but it's been in a lot of D&D products since at least 3.5E, especially adventures I think. I can think of probably six or seven 4E hardcover supplements that I've seen this type of error in, too.
 


There are two "page xx" errors on page 7. Both of them are "See also 'Damage Type,' page xx."

It's nothing of dawizard proportions, I admit. I only mention it because I hardly ever see typos of this sort in D&D books.

There's another one near that- I think in the Slaad entry on disease.

Those bug me in particular- not only do they actively make the book less useful unlike other typos, but they're also the most common error in RPG bookdom. You'd think that error specifically would be handled by now.
 

Yeah, I think they missed all of the "look at page xx" entries, as so far I have yet to notice one (well, other than the index) where it refers the party to a page other than "xx". Not a big deal, as in almost all cases the rule is on the opposite page - the only exception to that is the reference to the Elemental Eye - if I hadn't read the MM through I would never have known where that was. I guess the other exception is resistances referring to damage on pg. xx, but seeing as how you are in the glossary, the page number really isn't that important... you just flip back to "damage".
 

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top