AGGEMAM said:As always, when you enhance a magic weapon with a feat, one of the prereq's are that you have the feat in question.
smetzger said:Not always, USUALLY. For example the Ring of Evasion doesn't require Evasion, it requires the Jump spell.
AGGEMAM said:
Well, evasion IS NOT A FEAT.
smetzger said:
True, I guess thats a bad example. Keen is a better example of breaking the always rule. Also, I can't find this rule about items that grant feats have that feat as a prereq in the DMG. Could you provide a reference?
Thanks,
*:> Scott
smetzger said:
True, I guess thats a bad example. Keen is a better example of breaking the always rule. Also, I can't find this rule about items that grant feats have that feat as a prereq in the DMG. Could you provide a reference?
Thanks,
*:> Scott
Crothian said:There are no rules for putting feats into items. So, generally it's thought of as a bad idea.
kreynolds said:
Ironically enough, however, no other house rule is considered as "bad" as this. I wonder why that is?

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.