prodigyxss said:
I've read the reviews on the complete books and some of the quintessential series, but can't decide which company presents the material better.
Get thee to a FLGS!

Or at least see if you can check out some previews of some of the books, if you haven't already. For example, there's this link:
http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/ex/20041105a which has a few excerpts from Complete Arcane.
Unfortunately, I don't think the Quintessential books have previews freely available anywhere.
prodigyxss said:
To me they both just seem like mostly crunch, but what I am looking for is like half crunch, half fluff. So if you guys have an opinion on which company offers some fluff added to the obvious crunch could you please point them out for me. It seems like the quintessential series has more fluff, but is it really better compared to WOTC? Or if there are other books that would be better suited for me, just tell me.
More 'fluff'? The Quintessentials overall, probably. Better? Your call. Personally? I'd say the 'Quints' are - in general - more
interesting at least.
So... it might help if you said why you need these books.
For starters, are you a player? DM? Both? Either/or? Compulsive collector? Not sure?
What character classes, archetypes etc. do you favour, if any?
What do you hope these kinds of 'splatbooks' will allow you to do, that you can't do without them?
... stuff like that.
edit --- whoa, hang on a sec. One of your posts does mention
playing, in fact. So, presumably you're a player then? Please excuse my oversight there.
I don't know if it's just me, but I wouldn't know what to suggest when I don't even have a clue what you might want to be using 'class-splat' books for.
Oh, I will however second Stormborn's recommendation of Dragon magazines 310-312, and certain others (I'd have to look up some issue numbers there.) I've found them very useful.