Mongoose Snubbed at Ennies?

JoeGKushner

Adventurer
I'm surprised that there doesn't seem to be a single Mongoose Product. I'm just looking through the list seeing what I'll vote for and no I don't spot 'em. Am I missing 'em?
 

log in or register to remove this ad



JoeGKushner said:
Weird. I guess Mongoose is snubbing the Ennies eh?

I think it was an oversight. There are tons of 3E websites and this might have fallen off their radar. Obviously it shouldn't have since this is where it's at.

Hopefully they'll submit next year. But just for discussion which Mongoose product would you nominate?
 

Now that's a question...

No best adventure
No Best d20 game (I haven't read Judge Dread so no basis for comparision.)
Best Rules Supplement: I like what Mike did with Q. Wizard
No Best Campaign Setting
No Best Setting Supplement

Hell, I guess looking over most of the Ennies, it's easier to see why Mongoose didn't go for it. Someone with more Mongoose experience may want to field this one.
 




BECAUSE THEY SUCK! ;)

Really, I'm just irate because Matt refuses to talk to me any more, after getting a lot of ideas out of me, but I'll live. :p

I honestly don't know. I've liked the Mongoose Material just fine, and they really shoulda gotten some mention in their rules supplements.

Maybe they're having some big problems over there....:(

Good luck, guys! Make it better for next year!

....but next year you'll be up against my Silicon Phoenix work of genius, so maybe you should just cash in your chips now. :D
 
Last edited:

Teflon Billy said:
I'd have places Seas of Blood in "Best rules Supplement" ahead of Quintessential Wizard

We agree to disagree. I think that Seafarer's Handbook beats this one by a bit. Not vastly or greatly, but by a bit.
 

Remove ads

Top