Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monks and AC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="eamon" data-source="post: 4038389" data-attributes="member: 51942"><p>Just to point out, I <a href="http://www.enworld.org/showpost.php?p=4022538&postcount=27" target="_blank">did</a> do some number crunching, and the monk doesn't look good. If you want a different comparison (the linked post was an unarmed strike optimized dex monk of 9th level vs. a suboptimal fighter (warforged juggernaught) - and the monk does less damage), post the details. I'm also curious about dannyalcatraz's monk builds.</p><p></p><p>The conclusion, anyhow, that dex based monk's can compete on damage with strength based monks isn't backed by numbers <em>yet</em> - and, when using a weapon other than the unarmed strike - I don't believe it's possible. A dex-based monk using unarmed strike can get close to a str-based monk, since a lot of damage is base damage, and since a str-monk only gains 1 extra damage per str bonus and 1 extra damage per point of BAB invested in power attack, unlike the two handed weapon wielding fighter. Regardless, they'll never even get close to a simple fighter/barbarian, let alone some optimized Bo9S build.</p><p></p><p>I also second the notion that combat reflexes isn't to the dex-based monk's advantage. You rarely get more than one AoO per round, and very rarely get more than 3, which a 14 dex monk already could take with combat reflexes. Further, a strength-based monk will be hitting dealing more damage with the AoO's he does hit - so that means that in the majority of cases, when both versions of the monk can hit equally often, the str monk gets more benefit from combat reflexes than the dex based monk - no doubt about it.</p><p></p><p>Two-Weapon Fighting is controversial in the sense that not everyone agree's it can be applied to the monk's unarmed strike. In any case (and I'd allow it), it a very suboptimal way to deal more damage, since it imposes a hefty -2 penalty on all your other attacks. Especially from 11th level onward, when a monk has greater flurry, the extra attack at full bab just doesn't compare to the -2 taken on all the other attacks. Worse yet, it penalizes <em>all</em> attacks - so guess what? All those great AoO's which you hope to get are less likely to hit.</p><p></p><p>If you're going to analyze a build, you realistically have to consider at least the cases of one opponent, of few opponents, and of many opponents. You'll need to consider that an AC that's beyond a certain threshold has decreasing returns, since people will simply try to hit your allies and not you.</p><p></p><p>Comparing monks when they're swarmed with opponents, and assuming all opponents try to hit the monk isn't a representative test - and even in that heavily biased test, according to dannyalcatraz (who argues that dex-based AoO monks are worth a try), the monk's perform almost equally - and from the incomplete test description, I think the str based monk could easily have done better (by, for instance, not using a greatspear).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="eamon, post: 4038389, member: 51942"] Just to point out, I [url=http://www.enworld.org/showpost.php?p=4022538&postcount=27]did[/url] do some number crunching, and the monk doesn't look good. If you want a different comparison (the linked post was an unarmed strike optimized dex monk of 9th level vs. a suboptimal fighter (warforged juggernaught) - and the monk does less damage), post the details. I'm also curious about dannyalcatraz's monk builds. The conclusion, anyhow, that dex based monk's can compete on damage with strength based monks isn't backed by numbers [i]yet[/i] - and, when using a weapon other than the unarmed strike - I don't believe it's possible. A dex-based monk using unarmed strike can get close to a str-based monk, since a lot of damage is base damage, and since a str-monk only gains 1 extra damage per str bonus and 1 extra damage per point of BAB invested in power attack, unlike the two handed weapon wielding fighter. Regardless, they'll never even get close to a simple fighter/barbarian, let alone some optimized Bo9S build. I also second the notion that combat reflexes isn't to the dex-based monk's advantage. You rarely get more than one AoO per round, and very rarely get more than 3, which a 14 dex monk already could take with combat reflexes. Further, a strength-based monk will be hitting dealing more damage with the AoO's he does hit - so that means that in the majority of cases, when both versions of the monk can hit equally often, the str monk gets more benefit from combat reflexes than the dex based monk - no doubt about it. Two-Weapon Fighting is controversial in the sense that not everyone agree's it can be applied to the monk's unarmed strike. In any case (and I'd allow it), it a very suboptimal way to deal more damage, since it imposes a hefty -2 penalty on all your other attacks. Especially from 11th level onward, when a monk has greater flurry, the extra attack at full bab just doesn't compare to the -2 taken on all the other attacks. Worse yet, it penalizes [i]all[/i] attacks - so guess what? All those great AoO's which you hope to get are less likely to hit. If you're going to analyze a build, you realistically have to consider at least the cases of one opponent, of few opponents, and of many opponents. You'll need to consider that an AC that's beyond a certain threshold has decreasing returns, since people will simply try to hit your allies and not you. Comparing monks when they're swarmed with opponents, and assuming all opponents try to hit the monk isn't a representative test - and even in that heavily biased test, according to dannyalcatraz (who argues that dex-based AoO monks are worth a try), the monk's perform almost equally - and from the incomplete test description, I think the str based monk could easily have done better (by, for instance, not using a greatspear). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monks and AC
Top