This is probably a fairly newbish question, but it's something that has come up a couple of times at my table and I want to make sure that my ruling is correct (or correct enough.)
What exactly constitutes a monster (namely, creature that does not wield a weapon of any kind) basic attack?
My assumption has always been that the first listed at-will power of a given range would qualify for the creature's basic attack. For example, if an Abyssal Rotfiend (MM2 page 52) charges a PC, it would use its Skullsplitter attack as part of the charge. If the same creature was somehow given a chance to make a ranged basic attack, it would use Conjure Abscess.
I do see though how this ruling can make many monsters far nastier with a charge than PCs can be. Is this supported anywhere in the RAW, or am I completely off-base?
What exactly constitutes a monster (namely, creature that does not wield a weapon of any kind) basic attack?
My assumption has always been that the first listed at-will power of a given range would qualify for the creature's basic attack. For example, if an Abyssal Rotfiend (MM2 page 52) charges a PC, it would use its Skullsplitter attack as part of the charge. If the same creature was somehow given a chance to make a ranged basic attack, it would use Conjure Abscess.
I do see though how this ruling can make many monsters far nastier with a charge than PCs can be. Is this supported anywhere in the RAW, or am I completely off-base?