Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monte Cook joins Pathfinder team
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 4220580" data-attributes="member: 710"><p>The Fighter gets extra attack and damage bonus, does he not? Will this not change the math and the balance (both between classes and between characters and monsters)?</p><p></p><p>Maybe the changes to the magical items can compensate this. If a Fighter has to choose between more strength to gain to-hit and damage or more con to gain survivability, this evens out his "average damage" x "hp" compared to a 3.5 Fighter or a 3PF Barbarian...</p><p>(Is this enough?)</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>My concrete concern with Pathfinder's backwards compatibility are the splat books. Adventures can be tweaked by adding a few extra monsters, this shouldn't be so difficult (assuming averarage to-hits and to-saves are still in the same ballpark).</p><p>But I'd hate if I couldn't use the non-PHB core classes anymore, or the Prestige Classes. (I think feats and spells will have less problems). Admittedly, there are only few PrCs I ever bothered to use, but we have used some of the core classes in our group. </p><p>We're turning our Savage Tides campaign to Pathfinder, and I already had to say goodbye to my Warlock, which is somewhat sad, because I really enjoyed playing him. </p><p></p><p>Pathfinders current benefit is that it is a breath of fresh air to anyone involved. You can have played dozens of Fighters in 3.x, but the 3PF Fighter is different and new. </p><p>But if Pathfinder will go longer then a year, people will want more. The existing classes won't cut it. And if you have a library of 3.x producs with PrCs and base classes, you want to use them. But do you want to adapt them manually to Pathfinder? (Since Paizo often can't do it, since it's not open content?) Or will I throw those books away and get Paizos equivalent of splatbooks (will there even be any? Would this come at the expense of other products, like adventures?)</p><p></p><p>Maybe I am worrying to much about this. (Considering I am certainly going 4E, unless I get sorely disappointed, I am from my egoistical perspective). Maybe Paizo already has their ideas how to do this. Maybe the fans have. But I hope this also gets discussed. </p><p></p><p>--</p><p></p><p>err... so what did this have to do with Monte? Errr... err... Look, there, at the horizon, a novel! *runs away*</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mustrum_Ridcully, post: 4220580, member: 710"] The Fighter gets extra attack and damage bonus, does he not? Will this not change the math and the balance (both between classes and between characters and monsters)? Maybe the changes to the magical items can compensate this. If a Fighter has to choose between more strength to gain to-hit and damage or more con to gain survivability, this evens out his "average damage" x "hp" compared to a 3.5 Fighter or a 3PF Barbarian... (Is this enough?) --- My concrete concern with Pathfinder's backwards compatibility are the splat books. Adventures can be tweaked by adding a few extra monsters, this shouldn't be so difficult (assuming averarage to-hits and to-saves are still in the same ballpark). But I'd hate if I couldn't use the non-PHB core classes anymore, or the Prestige Classes. (I think feats and spells will have less problems). Admittedly, there are only few PrCs I ever bothered to use, but we have used some of the core classes in our group. We're turning our Savage Tides campaign to Pathfinder, and I already had to say goodbye to my Warlock, which is somewhat sad, because I really enjoyed playing him. Pathfinders current benefit is that it is a breath of fresh air to anyone involved. You can have played dozens of Fighters in 3.x, but the 3PF Fighter is different and new. But if Pathfinder will go longer then a year, people will want more. The existing classes won't cut it. And if you have a library of 3.x producs with PrCs and base classes, you want to use them. But do you want to adapt them manually to Pathfinder? (Since Paizo often can't do it, since it's not open content?) Or will I throw those books away and get Paizos equivalent of splatbooks (will there even be any? Would this come at the expense of other products, like adventures?) Maybe I am worrying to much about this. (Considering I am certainly going 4E, unless I get sorely disappointed, I am from my egoistical perspective). Maybe Paizo already has their ideas how to do this. Maybe the fans have. But I hope this also gets discussed. -- err... so what did this have to do with Monte? Errr... err... Look, there, at the horizon, a novel! *runs away* [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Monte Cook joins Pathfinder team
Top