Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Monte on Origins awards and ENnies
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rasyr" data-source="post: 2400875" data-attributes="member: 2855"><p>There is actually a term for this mentality. It is called the Frontlist Syndrome. Now, I am by no means an expert on it, and actually just barely understand it myself. But in short, it is simply the fact that this short life cycle mentality feeds on itself. It is also a large contributor to that death spiral thing that Mearls and Dancey have mentioned (though neither bothered to include it in their explanations).</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, once a company gets into the Frontlist Syndome, it is very very hard to pull yourself out of.</p><p></p><p>Yup, like I mention above, it feeds off itself, and the company often ends up either putting out a ton of product every month just to keep afloat or slowly going under.</p><p></p><p>The Frontlist Syndrome has been around for a long long time. CCGs made it a lot more noticable and prevalent.Also, the OGL made this a lot, lot worse as well.Suddenly there were hundreds of companies putting out products every single month, and then moving on to the next thing, trying to get it out before somebody else used the same concept. There was a lot of paralell development going on for many concepts and themes, and this actually hurt the industry more than it helped (especially since almost nobody was using anybody else's OGC, but developing their own instead). </p><p></p><p>Then you have distributors... Distributors often tend to encourage the Frontlist Syndrome because it means less older stock on their shelves, and thus they have less to push and can concentrate on the "new" stuff rather than an increasing amount of backstock.</p><p></p><p>Then came the fulfillment houses like Wizard's Attic and Osseum. Both were loved by distributors because that meant even less overhead for them, as the fulfillment houses were acting as backstock wharehouses and this thus increased the profits for the distributors. Both of these fulfillment houses have since died, Wizard Attic taking a number of companies with it, and Osseum hurting a large number of companies (some more than others, though I don't think that any actually died from it). The fulfillment house model just isn't a very solid one overall. Of course, part of Osseum's troubles came from being involved with book-trade distributors (will explain a little about that at the bottom).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It is not quite a fact of life for those that follow the current 3 teir business model in the industry, but close to it. The distributors actually have a much greater impact on what you can find in your local game store than the actual companies do. Personally, I do not think that this is a good thing, but it also something that is hard to break out of. I know that there are a lot of stores who don't carry ICE products. Why? Because they only deal with one distributor (the largest), who also happens to refuse to carry our products (because of a personal grudge by one VP - even though his regional wharehouses have asked them to carry us). Nothing we can do about that, other than to encourage our fans to print out a copy of our distributor list and take it to those stores..</p><p></p><p>Oops, slight ramble... back on topic now... </p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, that wouldn't be me keeping our product in stores... hehe... That would be my boss. And that is because he isn't following the older 3 teir business model. </p><p></p><p>He simply changed the way that we deal with our distributors. Rather than them ordering when they run out, we do more of a consignment type of thing. We setup a "floorplan" with them, and send them the product. Each month, they send us a report of what they have sold, along with payment for sold product (according to whatever terms the boss has worked out with them). We then refill that floorplan. The boss has this setup with almost all (if not all) of our domestic distributors, and is working on similar deals with our foreign ones.</p><p></p><p>Same with my post. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>Book-trade distributors - These are the distributors that deal with book stores such as Barnes & Noble, Waldenbooks, Amazon, etc. They work a little bit differently than normal distributors. The biggest difference being that they require a return policy. They order books, and pay on pre-arranged terms just like other distributors, however, they also require that companies that they purchase from accept returns as well. And guess what. Come around the end of the year, they are going to be returning books because the less they have on their shelves for the year end inventory reports, the better their accounting looks. Unfortunately, since they are returning products that they have already paid for, this means a refund to them, which can really screw up the accounting and cash flows of the companies to whom books have been returned. Only the largest companies can really afford to eat these costs. </p><p></p><p>While I do not know for certain, it is a good bet that this return policy was a factor in what happened to Osseum.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rasyr, post: 2400875, member: 2855"] There is actually a term for this mentality. It is called the Frontlist Syndrome. Now, I am by no means an expert on it, and actually just barely understand it myself. But in short, it is simply the fact that this short life cycle mentality feeds on itself. It is also a large contributor to that death spiral thing that Mearls and Dancey have mentioned (though neither bothered to include it in their explanations). Unfortunately, once a company gets into the Frontlist Syndome, it is very very hard to pull yourself out of. Yup, like I mention above, it feeds off itself, and the company often ends up either putting out a ton of product every month just to keep afloat or slowly going under. The Frontlist Syndrome has been around for a long long time. CCGs made it a lot more noticable and prevalent.Also, the OGL made this a lot, lot worse as well.Suddenly there were hundreds of companies putting out products every single month, and then moving on to the next thing, trying to get it out before somebody else used the same concept. There was a lot of paralell development going on for many concepts and themes, and this actually hurt the industry more than it helped (especially since almost nobody was using anybody else's OGC, but developing their own instead). Then you have distributors... Distributors often tend to encourage the Frontlist Syndrome because it means less older stock on their shelves, and thus they have less to push and can concentrate on the "new" stuff rather than an increasing amount of backstock. Then came the fulfillment houses like Wizard's Attic and Osseum. Both were loved by distributors because that meant even less overhead for them, as the fulfillment houses were acting as backstock wharehouses and this thus increased the profits for the distributors. Both of these fulfillment houses have since died, Wizard Attic taking a number of companies with it, and Osseum hurting a large number of companies (some more than others, though I don't think that any actually died from it). The fulfillment house model just isn't a very solid one overall. Of course, part of Osseum's troubles came from being involved with book-trade distributors (will explain a little about that at the bottom). It is not quite a fact of life for those that follow the current 3 teir business model in the industry, but close to it. The distributors actually have a much greater impact on what you can find in your local game store than the actual companies do. Personally, I do not think that this is a good thing, but it also something that is hard to break out of. I know that there are a lot of stores who don't carry ICE products. Why? Because they only deal with one distributor (the largest), who also happens to refuse to carry our products (because of a personal grudge by one VP - even though his regional wharehouses have asked them to carry us). Nothing we can do about that, other than to encourage our fans to print out a copy of our distributor list and take it to those stores.. Oops, slight ramble... back on topic now... Well, that wouldn't be me keeping our product in stores... hehe... That would be my boss. And that is because he isn't following the older 3 teir business model. He simply changed the way that we deal with our distributors. Rather than them ordering when they run out, we do more of a consignment type of thing. We setup a "floorplan" with them, and send them the product. Each month, they send us a report of what they have sold, along with payment for sold product (according to whatever terms the boss has worked out with them). We then refill that floorplan. The boss has this setup with almost all (if not all) of our domestic distributors, and is working on similar deals with our foreign ones. Same with my post. :D Book-trade distributors - These are the distributors that deal with book stores such as Barnes & Noble, Waldenbooks, Amazon, etc. They work a little bit differently than normal distributors. The biggest difference being that they require a return policy. They order books, and pay on pre-arranged terms just like other distributors, however, they also require that companies that they purchase from accept returns as well. And guess what. Come around the end of the year, they are going to be returning books because the less they have on their shelves for the year end inventory reports, the better their accounting looks. Unfortunately, since they are returning products that they have already paid for, this means a refund to them, which can really screw up the accounting and cash flows of the companies to whom books have been returned. Only the largest companies can really afford to eat these costs. While I do not know for certain, it is a good bet that this return policy was a factor in what happened to Osseum. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Monte on Origins awards and ENnies
Top