Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Monte on Origins awards and ENnies
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Conaill" data-source="post: 2404749" data-attributes="member: 1264"><p>See my post on the previous page:</p><p></p><p></p><p>These two approaches will likely give very different results for second place winners. Doing it the way the voting specs recommend will tend to give more variety in the winners, whereas the method suggested in the launch screen description will tend to give a #2 which is more similar to the #1.</p><p></p><p>A little example perhaps... Let's say the ballot only has three significant candidates: one great d20 product, one great White Wolf product, and one mediocre d20 product. Let's further assume there are more d20 players on EN World than White Wolf players, and that most players into d20 don't tend to play WW and vice versa. The #1 winner will be obvious in this case: it will be the excellent d20 product. </p><p></p><p>Now let's look at what would happen if we follow the voting specs to determine the #2 winner. We keep eliminating candidates until only two remain, so the last product eliminated will be the mediocre d20 product, because that one will receive the least #1 votes (because most d20 players will vote for the excellent product instead). Result: the excellent WW product wins 2nd place.</p><p></p><p>Now let's see what would happen if we follow the description on the launch screen. After we've found the #1 winner (the excellent d20 product), we eliminate this product and rerun the process again. Now we get a run-off between one mediocre d20 product and one excellent WW product. Since all those d20-only players now get to vote for the mediocre d20 product, that one will win 2nd place.</p><p></p><p>End result: the method described in the voting specs will tend to "spread out the happiness" by awarding the second prize to those voters who saw their favorite product lose out on the first prize. Personally, I think that is a GOOD thing. The method described on the launch screen will tend to give all the prizes to the largest voter faction - which I think is a BAD thing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Conaill, post: 2404749, member: 1264"] See my post on the previous page: These two approaches will likely give very different results for second place winners. Doing it the way the voting specs recommend will tend to give more variety in the winners, whereas the method suggested in the launch screen description will tend to give a #2 which is more similar to the #1. A little example perhaps... Let's say the ballot only has three significant candidates: one great d20 product, one great White Wolf product, and one mediocre d20 product. Let's further assume there are more d20 players on EN World than White Wolf players, and that most players into d20 don't tend to play WW and vice versa. The #1 winner will be obvious in this case: it will be the excellent d20 product. Now let's look at what would happen if we follow the voting specs to determine the #2 winner. We keep eliminating candidates until only two remain, so the last product eliminated will be the mediocre d20 product, because that one will receive the least #1 votes (because most d20 players will vote for the excellent product instead). Result: the excellent WW product wins 2nd place. Now let's see what would happen if we follow the description on the launch screen. After we've found the #1 winner (the excellent d20 product), we eliminate this product and rerun the process again. Now we get a run-off between one mediocre d20 product and one excellent WW product. Since all those d20-only players now get to vote for the mediocre d20 product, that one will win 2nd place. End result: the method described in the voting specs will tend to "spread out the happiness" by awarding the second prize to those voters who saw their favorite product lose out on the first prize. Personally, I think that is a GOOD thing. The method described on the launch screen will tend to give all the prizes to the largest voter faction - which I think is a BAD thing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Monte on Origins awards and ENnies
Top