Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 8046913" data-attributes="member: 6987520">LOL! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />There is a huge difference. Those suggestions you offer don't have any measure of wide support. Removing ASIs from race do.No, it is illogical to suggest an array of adjustments which won't be well received. Which is why more people responded in a manner sarcastic or mocking in tone to your OP.Changing racial ASIs is well received as the other thread points out. The problem there lies, however, that none of the solutions proposed so far don't create issues of their own to one person or another. That is why you don't see an overwhelming consensus in any of the options for moving the ASIs, but over all the desire for change is there.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DND_Reborn, post: 8046913, member: 6987520"] LOL! :D There is a [I]huge difference[/I]. Those suggestions you offer don't have any measure of wide support. Removing ASIs from race do. No, it is illogical to suggest an array of adjustments which won't be well received. Which is why more people responded in a manner sarcastic or mocking in tone to your OP. Changing racial ASIs is well received as the other thread points out. The problem there lies, however, that none of the solutions proposed so far don't create issues of their own to one person or another. That is why you don't see an overwhelming consensus in any of the options for moving the ASIs, but over all the desire for change is there. [/QUOTE]

Verification