Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Noah Ivaldi" data-source="post: 6666516" data-attributes="member: 6797143">Headbomb: I appreciate your input, even if I don't end up using the spell sheet generator. Good job, man.Others: Let's not get too worked up and attack Headbomb, guys. He made a suggestion. Yeah, it isn't likely to come out just the way that he'd like to see it very soon, but it's just a suggested feature. A large part of why this char sheet is so good is that MPMB is taking and implementing suggestions so well. Give Headbomb some credit; don't call him lazy.MPMB: I'll proofread all of the classes. I'll volunteer to do . . . What's the hardest? Warlock, right? Actually, probably Sorcerer. Well, no, maybe not . . . I mean, Cleric, Druid, and Wizard are pretty verbose, but you are clearly already in the works on Cleric, and that should provide a good base for the others . . . Well, pick a class or two, and you can volun-tell me to do them.Anyone: Have you looked at my Wild Shape Sheet, yet? I added a key to make it more easily read. I put it in the Senses/Proficiencies box on my current document. I'm going to add a little more info before updating it here. Did anyone notice any errors for me to fix before I do that, though? Once it's done, maybe MPMB can include it as auto-filled information for most druids, then Circle of the Moon druids can have their own sheet(s), which I may or may not help with at some point. Again, I contend that, if someone really wants to open up the can of worms that is Circle of the Moon, that person should really have the monster manual in his/her lap for the whole game.</blockquote>

Verification