Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="morepurplemorebetter" data-source="post: 6682819" data-attributes="member: 6788192">I do insist on making the sheet workable with only the first and the second page. I don't think room for magic item descriptions, conditions, or combat rules are essential parts of a sheet. It is great to hear you use the third page so much, because that's why I added it, but I want to accommodate those players that prefer a less-is-more approach as well (my group has some of those <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":P" title="Stick out tongue    :P"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":P" />).1) With the help of Noah Ivaldi the space issue for class features has been resolved. If you are referring to the things that are currently added to the third page, then your suggestion is not enough. There would be a lot more space needed than just three lines to make all these invocations/ki features/metamagic/maneuvres fit in the Class Features section.2) My players have never had an issue with the 38 items, but, in all honesty, we have not gone beyond level 10 in 5th edition yet.* I tested this, but with the current box size the font size would have to be 4. And the box size can't change if you want to fit your suggested text next to it because it is pretty long to fit on 1 line* I would hate to make the coin icons smaller, because a lot of work went into them. They are already pretty small in the printed version. I guess it could be more compact, making room for maybe 1 whole equipment line.* I don't think this will save that much space, because with your suggestion it becomes rather wide. But it can easily be made to fit with any size of coin-boxes. Its current size is also dictated by the size of the coin-boxes.These alterations could make room for 1 line of equipment, and maybe even 2. But I don't think 3 is that viable. It is a lot of work for 2 extra equipment lines. I'll keep it under advisement, but I currently don't have that much time to spent on redesigning anything.3) I decided against doing this when I was making these sections. Not all armours/weapons have weight so the field would be left empty often. Those sections are already really busy with fields and I don't want to put more fields there, making it look too cluttered.Do you really need to be able to move the three magic items on page 2? There are only 3... If I find the time I can look into this, but it is just as much work making this for just these three fields as it was making it for all the other fields, so that's why I'm hasitant.Having the magic items on page 3 be movable/sortable is not a bad idea! I'll see when I can implement that.</blockquote>

Verification