Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
MPMB's D&D 5e Character Tools
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="morepurplemorebetter" data-source="post: 6747002" data-attributes="member: 6788192"><p>Short answer: this won't work, because all the text/checkboxes will be wrongly aligned. Making the 'blue' 'looking nice' would make the text look awful.</p><p></p><p>The form fields are layout as they currently are to make all the things you put in them fit to the rest of the sheet. Either fit the text to the lines (the overlapping fields), or fit the "X" in the checkbox (the checkboxes). Changing the size of the field would change the size and shape of what's in it along with it. Making the checkboxes as big as the white area would make the "X" so small it would just be a dot with a lot of white space around it. Moving the overlapping fields so that they adhere to the lines/box the text has to go in would make the text not align with the lines/box. Moving the top of the field down would also move the top of the text down with the same amount. So the options are: have it work as it currently does or have better looking 'blue boxes' (as you call it, you can make it any colour you want in Acrobat) that have text in the wrong place. I choose the former <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>BTW, if you don't like how the blue looks, just turn off the colouring of form fields <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> I don't like looking at the sheet with all the form fields coloured like that, it is rather distracting IMHO. You can edit this feature in the settings of your Acrobat program (CTRL + K and go to "Forms").</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Great idea! One that I had while making it as well. Two problems with that:</p><p>1) where do you put the modifier fields so that it is still clear to what DC they belong.</p><p>2) when printing to greyscale, how do you understand what score goes with what DC? I see the arrows, but they are really tiny and break style with the rest of the sheet.</p><p>But I'll try if I can make something work, because it is something I was struggling with while implementing this feature.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm a bit taken aback by this post. Why do you think I'm "calling the thousand separator a 'decimal seperator'"? It clearly says decimal sep<strong>a</strong>rator right? You choose the thing that separates the integer from the fraction, not the thing that separates the thousands from the singles. Note that it only has effect on how the number display if you are not editing the field. You can always use both a comma and a dot as decimal separator when entering data. Acrobat has no option to select a space as a thousands separator, so that is not an option I can offer. Because numbers in the thousands will be very uncommon in the sheet, I choose to have the thousands separator by dependent on the decimal separator (i.e. a comma if the decimal separator is a dot and vice versa). Only the XP and money fields are likely to have numbers in the thousands. Using the, as you call it, 'common' version seemed to me as the most common thing people would want. The only extra option that would be viable in Acrobat would to offer the option to have no thousand separator, but I felt that writing code for that was a waste of time, and I still do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="morepurplemorebetter, post: 6747002, member: 6788192"] Short answer: this won't work, because all the text/checkboxes will be wrongly aligned. Making the 'blue' 'looking nice' would make the text look awful. The form fields are layout as they currently are to make all the things you put in them fit to the rest of the sheet. Either fit the text to the lines (the overlapping fields), or fit the "X" in the checkbox (the checkboxes). Changing the size of the field would change the size and shape of what's in it along with it. Making the checkboxes as big as the white area would make the "X" so small it would just be a dot with a lot of white space around it. Moving the overlapping fields so that they adhere to the lines/box the text has to go in would make the text not align with the lines/box. Moving the top of the field down would also move the top of the text down with the same amount. So the options are: have it work as it currently does or have better looking 'blue boxes' (as you call it, you can make it any colour you want in Acrobat) that have text in the wrong place. I choose the former ;) BTW, if you don't like how the blue looks, just turn off the colouring of form fields :) I don't like looking at the sheet with all the form fields coloured like that, it is rather distracting IMHO. You can edit this feature in the settings of your Acrobat program (CTRL + K and go to "Forms"). Great idea! One that I had while making it as well. Two problems with that: 1) where do you put the modifier fields so that it is still clear to what DC they belong. 2) when printing to greyscale, how do you understand what score goes with what DC? I see the arrows, but they are really tiny and break style with the rest of the sheet. But I'll try if I can make something work, because it is something I was struggling with while implementing this feature. I'm a bit taken aback by this post. Why do you think I'm "calling the thousand separator a 'decimal seperator'"? It clearly says decimal sep[B]a[/B]rator right? You choose the thing that separates the integer from the fraction, not the thing that separates the thousands from the singles. Note that it only has effect on how the number display if you are not editing the field. You can always use both a comma and a dot as decimal separator when entering data. Acrobat has no option to select a space as a thousands separator, so that is not an option I can offer. Because numbers in the thousands will be very uncommon in the sheet, I choose to have the thousands separator by dependent on the decimal separator (i.e. a comma if the decimal separator is a dot and vice versa). Only the XP and money fields are likely to have numbers in the thousands. Using the, as you call it, 'common' version seemed to me as the most common thing people would want. The only extra option that would be viable in Acrobat would to offer the option to have no thousand separator, but I felt that writing code for that was a waste of time, and I still do. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
MPMB's D&D 5e Character Tools
Top