Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Henadic Theologian" data-source="post: 8385720" data-attributes="member: 7030526">[MEDIA=tumblr]did=da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709;id=660777752631427072;key=_DCccSTF1S_YufVTvxA0vw;name=markrosewater[/MEDIA]fenraar asked:"What was the rationale for setting the next commander legends in Balders Gate? From the original commander legends reactions it seems there were a number of MTG legends that people still wanted to see printed whereas Elminster seemed to be the only one that I really saw people missing from AFR. Balders Gate is also just one city in the forgotten realms so presumably this limits options for legends vs the whole of the forgotten realms or other worlds/settings like Greyhawk or Eberron?""The second Commander Legends needed a theme and we thought the audience would enjoy another D&D set. There are going to be many opportunities to make more legendary characters from Magic’s past. We even have a whole premier expansion coming, Brothers War, set in the past with a lot of Magic characters people have been asking for." Alot of folks have been complaining that setting this next Commander Legends in FR means they won't be getting characters that have been going cardless, without realizing that they probably partly made CL: BfBG a FR set is so CL didn't step on the toes of Brother's War.</blockquote>