Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
MTOF: Elves are gender-swapping reincarnates and I am on board with it
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 7431871" data-attributes="member: 37579"><p>But, I repeat, are you playing AL? Because otherwise what AL does or does not is irrelevant to the conversation. </p><p></p><p>And while you may like playing with spirituality and mysticism and animism… you still need to fit the campaign setting. If the DM is okay with you playing a cleric to a totemic spirit then that's fine. If the DM isn't okay because clerics of causes don't fit their world, you shouldn't be able to wave the PHB in their face and say "But the RULES say I can be a cleric to a cause!" </p><p></p><p>(Anecdote here. While I believe you want to be a cleric of a cause because of your knowledge of other religions and types of spirituality, this wasn't universally the case. In 3e, I saw quite a few people opt to be clerics of causes so they could be clerics with not having to obey any dogma or restrictions and just murderhobo things up. )</p><p></p><p></p><p>Then don't use the 5e core rules. </p><p></p><p>Seriously. If 5e isn't hitting the right spots, switch to 13th Age, or Fate, or Genesys, or Cortex, or Fantasy AGE, or Cypher, or Pathfinder.</p><p>You have choices. </p><p></p><p>But… attacking on a game you don't like on a forum entirely dedicated to that game is not a good choice. That's like going to a barbeque and complaining about how you hate meat. It's not going to get a good reaction. And it's just going to derail any discussion being had. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, you can't cut-and-paste the PHB, so that's always going to be an issue. </p><p></p><p>The thing is, we're talking about flavour. Which is the easiest thing in the game to change. It's when the rules and tone of the mechanics are problematic that are far more of an issue.</p><p>If you want gritty realism or fragile characters or low magic then D&D gets in the way of the world. Because any changes need to be written and balanced and playtested and taught to the players. </p><p></p><p>Flavour is simple. </p><p>In my campaign setting, sorcerers gain their magic by drinking the blood or powerful beings with arcane power (celestials, dragons, fiends, etc), and barbarians are possessed with a primal spirit of rage that threatens to consume their minds and turn them into feral beasts of unceasing fury.</p><p>I'm not going to get mad at the rules of the game for not accommodating my vision of the class. The job of the book is to present the baseline and give enough flavour for rushed DMs to improv a setting on the fly. </p><p></p><p></p><p>There are campaign settings without elves or dwarves despite the many pages in the PHB that insist they are a thing. </p><p>Again, no orcs or drow in Dragonlance, no gnomes and orcs in Dark Sun.</p><p>2e tied clerics with deities even more tightly than 5e and Dark Sun still managed to have elemental cults. </p><p></p><p>It takes ONE SENTENCE: </p><p style="margin-left: 20px">"The gods are remote and do not directly grant spells, although some clerics believe otherwise and insist they are the chosen champions of their deity, but agnostic clerics who do not follow the tenets of a divine power continue to demonstrate spellcasting."</p><p>Bam. Done. Suddenly, all the flavour in the PHB becomes unreliable narration from the believers. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Your problem here is that you're comparing the 3e SRD with the 5e PHB. The 3e PHB is also full of gods and references to the Greyhawk pantheon, which is the default.</p><p></p><p>Instead, try looking at the 5e SRD. The term "deity" only appears 9 times in the cleric entry and the term "god" 5 times. Most of the latter in reference to sample gods, which can just be deleted.</p><p>Changing that should take a two minutes. Tops.</p><p>Now compare this with the 18 references to "deity" in the cleric entry in the cleric entry of the 3e SRD! Literally twice as many. And hard rules like "A cleric’s alignment must be within one step of his deity’s". That sure sounds like you *need* to worship a god. Deities are just as assumed by the class.</p><p>And pretty much every single spell that references deities in 5e does so in 3e. </p><p></p><p>Again, the differences between 3e and 5e are largely additive. The 3e book ADDS text saying you can worship a cause or philosophy. So your problem is NOT what is in the 5e PHB, but what is missing. </p><p>So copy that text. Just pull it from the 3e SRD and throw it into your documents. Because that's the difference.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jester David, post: 7431871, member: 37579"] But, I repeat, are you playing AL? Because otherwise what AL does or does not is irrelevant to the conversation. And while you may like playing with spirituality and mysticism and animism… you still need to fit the campaign setting. If the DM is okay with you playing a cleric to a totemic spirit then that's fine. If the DM isn't okay because clerics of causes don't fit their world, you shouldn't be able to wave the PHB in their face and say "But the RULES say I can be a cleric to a cause!" (Anecdote here. While I believe you want to be a cleric of a cause because of your knowledge of other religions and types of spirituality, this wasn't universally the case. In 3e, I saw quite a few people opt to be clerics of causes so they could be clerics with not having to obey any dogma or restrictions and just murderhobo things up. ) Then don't use the 5e core rules. Seriously. If 5e isn't hitting the right spots, switch to 13th Age, or Fate, or Genesys, or Cortex, or Fantasy AGE, or Cypher, or Pathfinder. You have choices. But… attacking on a game you don't like on a forum entirely dedicated to that game is not a good choice. That's like going to a barbeque and complaining about how you hate meat. It's not going to get a good reaction. And it's just going to derail any discussion being had. Well, you can't cut-and-paste the PHB, so that's always going to be an issue. The thing is, we're talking about flavour. Which is the easiest thing in the game to change. It's when the rules and tone of the mechanics are problematic that are far more of an issue. If you want gritty realism or fragile characters or low magic then D&D gets in the way of the world. Because any changes need to be written and balanced and playtested and taught to the players. Flavour is simple. In my campaign setting, sorcerers gain their magic by drinking the blood or powerful beings with arcane power (celestials, dragons, fiends, etc), and barbarians are possessed with a primal spirit of rage that threatens to consume their minds and turn them into feral beasts of unceasing fury. I'm not going to get mad at the rules of the game for not accommodating my vision of the class. The job of the book is to present the baseline and give enough flavour for rushed DMs to improv a setting on the fly. There are campaign settings without elves or dwarves despite the many pages in the PHB that insist they are a thing. Again, no orcs or drow in Dragonlance, no gnomes and orcs in Dark Sun. 2e tied clerics with deities even more tightly than 5e and Dark Sun still managed to have elemental cults. It takes ONE SENTENCE: [INDENT]"The gods are remote and do not directly grant spells, although some clerics believe otherwise and insist they are the chosen champions of their deity, but agnostic clerics who do not follow the tenets of a divine power continue to demonstrate spellcasting."[/INDENT] Bam. Done. Suddenly, all the flavour in the PHB becomes unreliable narration from the believers. Your problem here is that you're comparing the 3e SRD with the 5e PHB. The 3e PHB is also full of gods and references to the Greyhawk pantheon, which is the default. Instead, try looking at the 5e SRD. The term "deity" only appears 9 times in the cleric entry and the term "god" 5 times. Most of the latter in reference to sample gods, which can just be deleted. Changing that should take a two minutes. Tops. Now compare this with the 18 references to "deity" in the cleric entry in the cleric entry of the 3e SRD! Literally twice as many. And hard rules like "A cleric’s alignment must be within one step of his deity’s". That sure sounds like you *need* to worship a god. Deities are just as assumed by the class. And pretty much every single spell that references deities in 5e does so in 3e. Again, the differences between 3e and 5e are largely additive. The 3e book ADDS text saying you can worship a cause or philosophy. So your problem is NOT what is in the 5e PHB, but what is missing. So copy that text. Just pull it from the 3e SRD and throw it into your documents. Because that's the difference. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
MTOF: Elves are gender-swapping reincarnates and I am on board with it
Top