Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 8479866" data-attributes="member: 93670">My original quote was pulling from the tools site on my phone.&nbsp; Looking at the v2 pdf it's even more explicit on AG378[spoiler=&quot;multiclassing: Extra Attack&quot;][ATTACH=full]148094[/ATTACH][/spoiler]A herald berserker monk or whatever would (probably?) not be covered if they also had fighter or marshal levels under strict <a href="https://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/6281/what-does-the-abbreviation-raw-mean" target="_blank">RAW</a> unless they had some combination of fighter/marshal levels that added to 11.&nbsp; In a way I think that might also be RAI since it limits the ability of those other classes to add a third multiplicative iteration of class abilities scaled for an assumption of 2 max without a GM saying &quot;hmm... I'm not sure but going to allow it for now with the caveat that we might need to work on some stuff if it becomes problematic&quot; or similar. A synergy feat could even do something like declare that &quot;your non-fighter/marshal levels count as fighter/marshal levels for the purposes of extra attack&quot; if a particular 3&amp;3 combo was designed to get that kind of tradeoff like a 3fighter/marshal+3rogue that has reduced sneak scaling in exchange for debuffing attacks or whatever.What kind of corner cases are missing?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 8479866, member: 93670"] My original quote was pulling from the tools site on my phone. Looking at the v2 pdf it's even more explicit on AG378 [spoiler="multiclassing: Extra Attack"][ATTACH type="full"]148094[/ATTACH] [/spoiler] A herald berserker monk or whatever would [I](probably?)[/I] not be covered if they also had fighter or marshal levels under strict [URL='https://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/6281/what-does-the-abbreviation-raw-mean']RAW[/URL] unless they had some combination of fighter/marshal levels that added to 11. In a way I [I]think[/I] that might also be RAI since it limits the ability of those other classes to add a third multiplicative iteration of class abilities scaled for an assumption of 2 max without a GM saying [I]"hmm... I'm not sure but going to allow it for now with the caveat that we might need to work on some stuff if it becomes problematic"[/I] or similar. A synergy feat could even do something like declare that [I]"your non-fighter/marshal levels count as fighter/marshal levels for the purposes of extra attack"[/I] if a particular 3&3 combo was designed to get that kind of tradeoff like a 3fighter/marshal+3rogue that has reduced sneak scaling in exchange for debuffing attacks or whatever. What kind of corner cases are missing? [/QUOTE]

Verification