Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="noodohs" data-source="post: 8480357" data-attributes="member: 7033037">I think the idea is that you need 11 total levels (combined levels) between two classes that would both give you the 11th-level extra attack. So it could be 11 levels of fighter, 11 levels of marshal, or some combination of the two that total 11 levels. With that, a fighter 5/marshal 5 wouldn't qualify as you only have 10 total levels and if you had not multiclassed, you wouldn't yet have the 11-th level feature in either class. That seems intentional because otherwise a multiclass fighter/marshal would always be more powerful than just one or the other, which doesn't make a lot of sense. By a similar token, fighter 1 marshal 10 would still qualify, I think. But maybe that's not the intent, maybe you need to have at least one extra attack feature from each class and a total of 11 levels to get the 3rd attack. Personally, I think either ruling works fine in terms of balance, but having only 10 total levels and getting a third attack doesn't make much sense to me.Edit: This wouldn't apply to adepts because it's a focus feature and none of the other classes give you a third attack at 11th level, hence being limited to fighters and marshals.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="noodohs, post: 8480357, member: 7033037"] I think the idea is that you need 11 total levels (combined levels) between two classes that would both give you the 11th-level extra attack. So it could be 11 levels of fighter, 11 levels of marshal, or some combination of the two that total 11 levels. With that, a fighter 5/marshal 5 wouldn't qualify as you only have 10 total levels and if you had not multiclassed, you wouldn't yet have the 11-th level feature in either class. That seems intentional because otherwise a multiclass fighter/marshal would always be more powerful than just one or the other, which doesn't make a lot of sense. By a similar token, fighter 1 marshal 10 would still qualify, I think. But maybe that's not the intent, maybe you need to have at least one extra attack feature from each class [I]and [/I]a total of 11 levels to get the 3rd attack. Personally, I think either ruling works fine in terms of balance, but having only 10 total levels and getting a third attack doesn't make much sense to me. Edit: This wouldn't apply to adepts because it's a focus feature and none of the other classes give you a third attack at 11th level, hence being limited to fighters and marshals. [/QUOTE]

Verification