Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 7168416" data-attributes="member: 2011">...then there's really no possibility of a detailed comparison as opposed to claims. It sounds like you don't want to back up your opinion.There is already cherry picking with multiclassing. Paladin 8 / Warlock 2 with real powerful ranged attacks for limited cost. Paladin / Warlock doesn't even make much sense ("Wait, you deity is ok with you gaining power from a fiend from hell?"), but it is still played at tables.Tens of thousands of players have already played Warlock 2 / Some Other Class X because Warlock is so front ended. I had 3 players do that in our campaign such that the table decided to ban Warlock multiclassing completely.The game already has these type of multiclass shenanigans. Cleric 1 / Wizard X is a fine example. It doesn't mean that they are unbalanced unless one does an analysis to figure it out. We banned Warlock at our table due to anecdotal evidence (like the Sorcerer/Warlock being able to do the equivalent of Disintegrate level damage multiple times a day at level 7 or so).If Cleric 7 / Wizard 6 was balanced in AD&D when the rest of the PCs are level 8, then this too might very well be balanced.</blockquote>