CleverNickName
Limit Break Dancing
I've toyed with the idea of letting the Eldritch Knight and the Arcane Trickster get their choice of the Magic Initiate or Ritual Caster feat for free at 3rd level.
Last edited:
D&D 5E My Super Simple Idea for a Better Fighter
Bill Zebub
“It’s probably Matt Mercer’s fault.”
Maybe a Feat I'd like to add (for all classes....rogue and monk would benefit, too) would be:
Quick Reflexes
You may take an additional reaction, but only one reaction per turn. This feat can be taken multiple times.
Quick Reflexes
You may take an additional reaction, but only one reaction per turn. This feat can be taken multiple times.
I am not a fan.
It is not OP compared to the best wizards, but it is not inline with the flavor of a fighter IMO. It feels very 3E to me and will lock fighters into being even more narrow than they currently are. I would like changes that make Fighters broad in terms of martial abilities, guys that can use any weapon and use it well instead of things which make a particular build dominant (example if you take shield master you are pretty much stuck using a shield or that is wasted). Thematically, to me a fighter is the guy in the party you turn to talk about fighting. He might be a hulking guy wielding a Glaive but if you want tips on two-weapon fighting with daggers he is the best guy to talk to. If the galley you are riding on has a ballistae on it he knows how to use it.
I would prefer to add things to the basic class at level 5 a few ideas:
- Proficiency with ANY weapon after spending an hour studying it (this includes things like siege weapons, catapults, ballistae as well as lasers or modern guns you find on a crashed spaceship)
- Ability to bypass class and race restrictions for using weapons or armor. Pull out that staff of power!
- Able to add proficiency bonus to any ability check about weaponry, martial arts, armor, armies or warfare.
- Able to use their choice of strength or dexterity for attack and damage rolls for any weapon that does not have the heavy property.
Bill Zebub
“It’s probably Matt Mercer’s fault.”
I mean, all that stuff is flavorful (except the staff of power thing....that was just bizarre) but I don't see most of it actually making the fighter more effective at killing things, except in rare circumstances. Unless the DM puts you on a lot of galleys with ballistae or whatever. You could just add all of that as ribbons to the base fighter class.
Charlaquin
Goblin Queen (She/Her/Hers)
Reckless Attack is a good example! I was also thinking of the Barbarian’s Frenzy - while the feature itself isn’t very good, the mechanic of gaining exhaustion after using it is a neat way to make it sort of 1/day, without having it be an actual resource you expend, and with the added ability to use it additional times in a pinch.
FWIW, that's more or less how the 13th Age fighter works. They have a number of special moves that they can trigger depending on the d20 attack roll.
I'm not sure how well that would translate to 5e though. In 13th age, weapon attacks deal 1 die/level damage (max level is 10), and you generally only get one attack per round. But in 5e, weapon damage itself is more or less static, and fighters deal extra damage at higher levels because they make more attacks. That would also give them more opportunities to trigger their special stuff. This may or may not be a good thing, but it's a thing one should consider.
Bill Zebub
“It’s probably Matt Mercer’s fault.”
Interesting idea. It’s another variant of situational mechanics, where the prerequisite “situation” is the fall of the die.
For the most part I don’t love it: it feels too abstract (“dissociative” some might say, although generally I don’t have a problem with mechanics that are thus disparagingly described) but also it gives the player no leeway to set up those situations. Not in the way that you might, for example, set up a situation where Shove becomes especially effective.
Yaarel
He Mage
Extra reactions would make things like reach broken, which turn out to be balanced in 5e because of the hard rule of only one reaction per round.
Reactions are cool conceptually, but the interruptions slow down gameplay.
Balancewise, it might be ok to spend the next action on a current extra reaction instead. Or get an extra reaction per short rest, or something like that.
Bill Zebub
“It’s probably Matt Mercer’s fault.”
What scenario would you worry about?
Threat:
A creature which willingly moves so it is no longer adjacent to you, or leaves your reach, is under threat by you until the end of your next turn. You have advantage on attacks on creatures under threat by you. The first time you hit a creature under threat by you your attack becomes a critical hit.
This is a reaction-less "more reactions". It does require tracking who is under threat.
A creature which willingly moves so it is no longer adjacent to you, or leaves your reach, is under threat by you until the end of your next turn. You have advantage on attacks on creatures under threat by you. The first time you hit a creature under threat by you your attack becomes a critical hit.
This is a reaction-less "more reactions". It does require tracking who is under threat.
