• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

my thoughts on 4e MM art


log in or register to remove this ad

Lord Tirian said:
What do you dislike about Jarvis' art? I like it - very much.

Just curious.

Cheers, LT.

I'm recalling pieces from various FR products. I don't have my books with me now but his versions of yuan-ti, in particular, were hideous. I'll try and find some specific examples.
 

demiurge1138 said:
Really, I'm annoyed by all of the reused art. 15 pieces, four of them from the 3.5 Monster Manual!
Me too. IIRC, there's also reused art in the DMG. I don't understand if it's true what ThE Rouse said, that they spent a seven digit amount on creating 4E, that they didn't spend a few thousands more and skipped the reuse.

And why the hell did they reuse art from 3.5 and not from Magic or Mageknight or something. Using 3.X art is 100% certain to be noticed!
 
Last edited:

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top