Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
My thoughts on 5e (mostly martial power source)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TwinBahamut" data-source="post: 5789961" data-attributes="member: 32536"><p>I'm not really a fan of the idea of Fighter powers, since that term implies a unity of mechanics across the game like in 4E, but Fighters absolutely need to have some equivalent (maneuvers, I suppose). Returning to a situation where Fighters can only make basic attacks would be unacceptable.</p><p></p><p>Power sources are also fine, since that's really a thing that has always been in the game. Characters have always been martial, arcane, divine, psionic, or whatever. 4E's main problem was that it forced a class to be just one of those. I'll agree with the topic starter that modifying the power source system so that a class can use multiple power sources would be a big improvement.</p><p></p><p>Also, as I mentioned in other threads, I rather like the idea of "power lists" that are shared at least a bit by different classes of the same power source. This is particularly true for martial characters. I don't want 4E's unified power system, but power source-specific mechanics and/or mechanical elements are a tradition for the game. It would be nice to see that extend to martial combat just as much as it was true for Arcane spell lists or Psionic power lists.</p><p></p><p>I'll disagree with a lot of the other particulars mentioned in the first post, though. If nothing else, I like roles (just not 4E's roles).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TwinBahamut, post: 5789961, member: 32536"] I'm not really a fan of the idea of Fighter powers, since that term implies a unity of mechanics across the game like in 4E, but Fighters absolutely need to have some equivalent (maneuvers, I suppose). Returning to a situation where Fighters can only make basic attacks would be unacceptable. Power sources are also fine, since that's really a thing that has always been in the game. Characters have always been martial, arcane, divine, psionic, or whatever. 4E's main problem was that it forced a class to be just one of those. I'll agree with the topic starter that modifying the power source system so that a class can use multiple power sources would be a big improvement. Also, as I mentioned in other threads, I rather like the idea of "power lists" that are shared at least a bit by different classes of the same power source. This is particularly true for martial characters. I don't want 4E's unified power system, but power source-specific mechanics and/or mechanical elements are a tradition for the game. It would be nice to see that extend to martial combat just as much as it was true for Arcane spell lists or Psionic power lists. I'll disagree with a lot of the other particulars mentioned in the first post, though. If nothing else, I like roles (just not 4E's roles). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
My thoughts on 5e (mostly martial power source)
Top