WyzardWhately
First Post
Should that say "paragon path"?
D&D 4E Neceros' 4e Character Sheet (Version: 1.00)
- Thread starter neceros
- Start date
neceros
Adventurer
I have a personal issue with the way they are using these terms. They need to rename these to something that can be easily interpolated.WyzardWhately said:
Class is one word.
Paragon Path is two words, an alliteration and sounds dumb.
Epic Destiny is two words.
They don't match, and I'm OCD.
neceros
Adventurer
Website was updated, a new version of the character sheet being released soon.
On a side note, I have a bit of a question to people.
As it seems with Powers and Attacks in Fourth, I'm noticing that an attack is much less likely to use your Str or Dex now, and instead use whatever special ability described in the power.
My question is: Do you think it's worthwhile to keep "Melee" and "Ranged" boxes on the sheet? Is a default melee attack Str? Will it matter?
Happy gaming!
On a side note, I have a bit of a question to people.
As it seems with Powers and Attacks in Fourth, I'm noticing that an attack is much less likely to use your Str or Dex now, and instead use whatever special ability described in the power.
My question is: Do you think it's worthwhile to keep "Melee" and "Ranged" boxes on the sheet? Is a default melee attack Str? Will it matter?
Happy gaming!
RandomCitizenX
First Post
neceros said:
Seems like it would be safe to ditch the ranged and melee boxes due to the powers' variety.
Right now, your site "can't find the file specified," so I'm not sure exactly what you are asking about. However, I would imagine simply having a space to write down the range or reach of any basic attack would be fine. There's no need to two different sections for basic attacks just because the ability score changes.
Similar Threads
