Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 8092836" data-attributes="member: 8461">Always good to talk to you, U_K. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />That's sort of what I remember; as I recall, the plans were for various "types" of undead, (e.g. the incorporeals (ghosts, spectres, wraiths, etc.), the ones that ate the living (ghouls, vampires, etc.), the kind that sustained themselves with a higher power (e.g. mummies, liches, etc.)) were going to get a series of escalating templates across divine/cosmic strata, so something like two or three templates for each category. Of course, I'm probably misremembering, since the akalich was the only one for the lich.You cheeky SOB.Okay, I think I understand better now. In that case, it's a bit too easy for me to imagine dragons (no music pun intended), simply because those were very evocative the first time around. That said, I'm now trying to think of categories of monsters, and that's a bit harder to imagine.I'll say this though: if we have the option of choosing actual (over)divinities, a la your presentation of Surtur (from the unfinished Gods & Monsters), complete with various manifestations, servitors, realm, etc., then I'd choose that hands down.I was initially going to say B, but looking at those titles I'm seriously tempted to change my answer to C. Presuming that abominations, angels, and (maybe) dragons are already adequately covered...and we can't choose divinities as a category...I'm not sure what to pick.</blockquote>

Verification