New Ampersand from Bill Slavicsek

Bill Slaviscek has a new Ampersand article up on D&DI.

Here're the parts with 4e material, though I think we've seen most of it before:

Bill Slaviscek said:
And speaking of getting close, this is the time when we begin to share more detailed information with D&D players everywhere. I'm thankful that we can finally start to open up a little more and let you see what we're working on, so to speak. Some of this takes the form of a couple of preview products that are about to release, as well as the newest set of D&D miniatures, Desert of Desolation, which debuted two weeks ago.
Preview Products

Wizards Presents: Races and Classes hits the store shelves in a couple of weeks. This is the first of two 4th Edition preview products designed to provide you with a behind-the-curtain glimpse of the making of the 4th Edition of the Dungeons & Dragons Roleplaying Game. (The second is Wizards Presents: Worlds and Monsters, on sale in January.) Full of concept art, designer essays, and insights into R&D's thinking, Races and Classes previews the new version of the game from a player's perspective.

Races and Classes provides a bunch of great information and reveals a number of secrets, including:

* The nature and first look at the as-yet-unrevealed new player character race.
* A timeline of the design and development of 4th Edition, including notes from the design team.
* The top-secret 4th Edition design tenets.
* An overview of Player Handbook classes and power sources.
* A preview of classes slated for future development after the launch of the Player's Handbook.
* All kinds of background information, in-world stories, and anecdotes about what it takes to create a new edition.

Check out Races and Classes (and its companion volume, Worlds and Monsters) for amazing artwork, intriguing spoilers, and a ton of information on what's coming in the new edition -- from the first set of core books to future products later in the line. I know all this stuff, and I couldn't stop reading. Not only is it fascinating material, but it got my mind racing about characters I want to play and campaigns I want to run using the new edition. I think you'll have the same reaction.
Desert of Desolation

The newest set of D&D miniatures, Desert of Desolation, provides a different kind of look at 4th Edition. First off, every creature in the set exists in 4th Edition D&D and almost all of them will appear in the first Monster Manual. (One monster receives special treatment and will get its first updated statistics on D&D Insider.)

Second, this set showcases the first of our updates to the look and feel of D&D monsters. Now, when a monster looks just great, we've left it alone. But in cases where we felt we could improve the look of a monster, we've taken this opportunity to do so. Our new look for angels, for example, debuts in this set with the Angel of Vengeance. It's otherworldly, looks powerful, and has just the right mix of awe-inspiring and creepy to better define these servants of the gods. Another update can be seen in the Feral Troll, which continues the artistic evolution of one of the terrors of D&D that has been updated with each new edition of the game.

Third, this set reveals some monsters making their debut in 4th Edition. The Cyclops appears for the first time since 2nd Edition and looks fantastic, and the Fire Archon unleashes the first of a new elemental force on unsuspecting adventurers everywhere.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

* The nature and first look at the as-yet-unrevealed new player character race.
* A timeline of the design and development of 4th Edition, including notes from the design team.
* The top-secret 4th Edition design tenets.
* An overview of Player Handbook classes and power sources.
* A preview of classes slated for future development after the launch of the Player's Handbook.

Delicious. Deeeeelicious.
 


Our new look for angels, for example, debuts in this set with the Angel of Vengeance. It's otherworldly, looks powerful, and has just the right mix of awe-inspiring and creepy to better define these servants of the gods.
It also suspiciously looks like it might have been from one of the Dreamblade miniature sets that were canceled.

Though I do like the new look for angels, less a being, more an embodiment and executor’s of a god’s will. Unless they are being sent to breed, they really have little reason to look attractive.
 

frankthedm said:
Though I do like the new look for angels, less a being, more an embodiment and executor’s of a god’s will. Unless they are being sent to breed, they really have little reason to look attractive.
Yep. Real appropriate when you consider the biblical Angels. The Angel of Death descending on the army outside of that... city, killing everyone and leaving the horses lathered and gasping for breath. The Angel of Whathaveyou sending fire down on Sodom and Gomorrah. That's not exactly warm and cuddly.
 


Rechan said:
Yep. Real appropriate when you consider the biblical Angels. The Angel of Death descending on the army outside of that... city, killing everyone and leaving the horses lathered and gasping for breath. The Angel of Whathaveyou sending fire down on Sodom and Gomorrah. That's not exactly warm and cuddly.
Oh, I really dislike "Hallmark Featherwastes", as I call the typical angel you's see as a statue or greeting card.

I prefer angels to be the "Fear Not." rather than "There-there childe."

The war-form of Pasquale's guardian angel is a fantastic example of how an angel should look. http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0740723677/ref=sib_dp_pt/102-4745537-0998564#reader-link
 

I'm a little surprised that he characterized the playtest feedback from "it's cool" to "needs some work". Did no one report that anything just wasn't good at all and needed going back to the drawing board? Even if it was an aberration and wasn't acted upon, I'm shocked that none of their playtesters thought ANYTHING in 4E wasn't good.
 

If we're going to get a 'first look' at the new race, would many of the possibilities we've discussed (Orc, Goblinoid, Dragonborn, Warforged, etc) qualify? Maybe the new race is going to be just that -- something completely new?

Or could it just mean first look at the Orc as a player race?

This mystery race continues to intrigue me.
 

JoelF said:
I'm a little surprised that he characterized the playtest feedback from "it's cool" to "needs some work". Did no one report that anything just wasn't good at all and needed going back to the drawing board? Even if it was an aberration and wasn't acted upon, I'm shocked that none of their playtesters thought ANYTHING in 4E wasn't good.
If you listen to the podcast, they gave indication of this.

One of the playtesters loved using a greataxe - it did more damage than any other weapon in the game. So they tore that out.

They also keep changing things drastically when it comes to Warlock abilities; when the warlock can do extra damage to Y.
 

Remove ads

Top