Griffith Dragonlake
First Post
Rather than call this class a mage or all-magician, why not … Magic-User ?!?
Because the mage is not a generic class.Griffith Dragonlake said:Rather than call this class a mage or all-magician, why not … Magic-User ?!?
I don't care for prestige classes, especially ones with...no HP?! This project actually originated from my favorite published class, the mystic theurge, and its problems. So thanks for the suggestion but it would just irritate me further to have a PrC that requires even more prep than the MT, but still does not truly create the all-magician archetype that I want.wolfpunk said:If it is something you really want to do, I think it has potential. Maybe, I am going way crazy overboard, but why not make your All-Magician a prestige class, and just do something simple like this.
That's an awesome class! Myself, I'm not a fan of MAD...even favored soul level MAD.Nifft said:Here's one I posted here a while back.
Same thing that distinguishes different wizards; spell choice. Thanks for the support, C.Cheiromancer said:The one worry I have is that getting rid of feats and such will tend to make mages very generic; what will distinguish different mages?
Tequila Sunrise said:That's an awesome class! Myself, I'm not a fan of MAD...even favored soul level MAD.