New Classes and Others

ff6shadow

First Post
[Post Removed]

As a result of people continually posting my work to file share sites, it will no longer be available.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad


So far, I'm really liking the Sorcerous Sentinel and the Lancer, as they're fairly well balanced and they help fill in the gaps in the source/role matrix without relying on campaign guides WotC has published (I'm one of those mildly OCD people who desperately desire that sort of symmetry). The dragon pact is a nice option for warlocks, as well. The others are also very well done, even if I'm not quite as interested in them as I am the aforementioned three.
 


I like the gambler. I liked it better when Lord Nat showed it to me almost 4 months ago, though.

If you're going to rip him off, though, you might want to do it somewhere other than where he originally posted it. That's kinda dumb.
 

EDIT: I'm retracting my post because it's best I let moderators handle what I was trying to handle, like Umbran has done below.
 
Last edited:

I like the gambler. I liked it better when Lord Nat showed it to me almost 4 months ago, though.

If you're going to rip him off, though, you might want to do it somewhere other than where he originally posted it. That's kinda dumb.


Um, I think you are mistaken. I find no such post by the user named Lord Nat. He's only posted once since the rules were officially released, and that was in August, and not about a gambler class.

If you feel a poster is doing something inappropriate, we ask that you gather your evidence and e-mail it to the moderators. Please do not make unfounded accusations against other users in public - it starts needless arguments.
 

Um, I think you are mistaken. I find no such post by the user named Lord Nat. He's only posted once since the rules were officially released, and that was in August, and not about a gambler class.

If you feel a poster is doing something inappropriate, we ask that you gather your evidence and e-mail it to the moderators. Please do not make unfounded accusations against other users in public - it starts needless arguments.

I'm not able to find the post in the live forums, and I lack any sort of search access, but he showed the class to me in person. I'd be happy to email timestamped files if I still had them, but I think Nat may already be on it, so after this I'll hush up about it.

The out-and-out accusation is a bit of a dick move, but I stand by it, as public awareness of a 'creator''s plaigarism is really the best punishment, and regardless of my own lack access to interweb published copies of the material, I have read the class this was obviously based upon, and did so months ago.
 

I've never heard of Lord Nat, nor am I aware of ever reading anything he's posted. If my class appears similar to his, it is simply a coincidence
 
Last edited:


Remove ads

Top