Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New D&D Monthly Survey: Mystics & Psionics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dire Bare" data-source="post: 7677157" data-attributes="member: 18182"><p>Nice? Well, yeah, it'd be nice. But a business would be pretty foolish to put money and manpower into something that isn't anything more than a nice gesture to placate a relatively small section of their fanbase.</p><p></p><p>Articles on Greyhawkian monsters, character types, or other crunchy bits would make great Dragon Magazine articles . . . but that kind of publication doesn't exist right now. The Unearthed Arcana articles serve a different purpose, to give us "needed" crunchy bits in playtest form that might eventually make it into a new product. WotC didn't do something "nice" by giving us Eberron crunchy bits in UA, they gave us playtest versions of unique character options that would be vital for a future Eberron product, one of their more popular settings that would make sense to revisit in a new product.</p><p></p><p>WotC will never admit it (nor should they), but we will never see a new Greyhawk product. Well, never say never, but it's pretty darned unlikely. Making a UA article on Greyhawk crunch a waste of resources. A nice waste, but a waste nonetheless. Besides, I can't really think of anything a Greyhawk campaign "needs" to have converted to 5E . . .</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In the real world, shamans are a distinct "role" from the druids of Europe, and are found all over the world in hunter-gatherer and nomadic societies. It needs to be its own class. IMO, of course!</p><p></p><p>But I hope WotC never touches the term of "witch doctor" or anything resembling it. Witch doctors are a real world concept, and a D&D version would most certainly fit as a shaman subclass . . . but the term has some pretty negative and racist connotations it has acquired over the years, and would not be a good fit for D&D, IMO. Especially because the "humanoid" witch doctors found in early D&D were very racist caricatures of "primitive" divine spellcasters and made me cringe even as a kid. I wouldn't mind a respectfully done "medicine man" or "sangoma" shaman subclass, however . . .</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dire Bare, post: 7677157, member: 18182"] Nice? Well, yeah, it'd be nice. But a business would be pretty foolish to put money and manpower into something that isn't anything more than a nice gesture to placate a relatively small section of their fanbase. Articles on Greyhawkian monsters, character types, or other crunchy bits would make great Dragon Magazine articles . . . but that kind of publication doesn't exist right now. The Unearthed Arcana articles serve a different purpose, to give us "needed" crunchy bits in playtest form that might eventually make it into a new product. WotC didn't do something "nice" by giving us Eberron crunchy bits in UA, they gave us playtest versions of unique character options that would be vital for a future Eberron product, one of their more popular settings that would make sense to revisit in a new product. WotC will never admit it (nor should they), but we will never see a new Greyhawk product. Well, never say never, but it's pretty darned unlikely. Making a UA article on Greyhawk crunch a waste of resources. A nice waste, but a waste nonetheless. Besides, I can't really think of anything a Greyhawk campaign "needs" to have converted to 5E . . . In the real world, shamans are a distinct "role" from the druids of Europe, and are found all over the world in hunter-gatherer and nomadic societies. It needs to be its own class. IMO, of course! But I hope WotC never touches the term of "witch doctor" or anything resembling it. Witch doctors are a real world concept, and a D&D version would most certainly fit as a shaman subclass . . . but the term has some pretty negative and racist connotations it has acquired over the years, and would not be a good fit for D&D, IMO. Especially because the "humanoid" witch doctors found in early D&D were very racist caricatures of "primitive" divine spellcasters and made me cringe even as a kid. I wouldn't mind a respectfully done "medicine man" or "sangoma" shaman subclass, however . . . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New D&D Monthly Survey: Mystics & Psionics
Top