Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 7674541" data-attributes="member: 2067">I WANT IT ALLBut I am a setting whore and I would even love to see their updated take on also-ran classes like seekers and runepriests, just to see what they'd do with 'em. Like, iteration is key for good design, so if they had to think about &quot;what did the Seeker offer and how did it succeed and how can it be improved and what is worth saving in it?&quot; I think we'd see something interesting. It's not like these things are inherently bad ideas, but the context they were presented in was less-than-encouraging, so I'd like to see another take on it. If there is a world where illumian runepriests and catfolk seekers and shardmind warmages are the new hotness, I'd like to see what that might look like. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> So, yeah, there is nothing on that list that I would not like to see in one form or another. I also like how they said &quot;character types&quot; not &quot;classes.&quot; Savvy. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />IIRC, the questions on this were a little wonky for that result - most of the questions were like &quot;what's your favorite bit?&quot; and &quot;what would you like to see more of?&quot; and not &quot;do you think this concept is fundamentally flawed?&quot; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 7674541, member: 2067"] [B]I WANT IT ALL[/B] But I am a setting whore and I would even love to see their updated take on also-ran classes like seekers and runepriests, just to see what they'd do with 'em. Like, iteration is key for good design, so if they had to think about "what did the Seeker offer and how did it succeed and how can it be improved and what is worth saving in it?" I think we'd see something interesting. It's not like these things are inherently bad ideas, but the context they were presented in was less-than-encouraging, so I'd like to see another take on it. If there is a world where illumian runepriests and catfolk seekers and shardmind warmages are the new hotness, I'd like to see what that might look like. :) So, yeah, there is nothing on that list that I would not like to see in one form or another. I also like how they said "character types" not "classes." Savvy. :) IIRC, the questions on this were a little wonky for that result - most of the questions were like "what's your favorite bit?" and "what would you like to see more of?" and not "do you think this concept is fundamentally flawed?" ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification